Really it is a big issue for CWA Institute and this matter was discussed by some ICWA authorities 3 years back.
ICAI is opposing the change of name not because it is favourable to CWA members but the change of name from CWA to CMA will give a very good identity to CWA Institute which is unfortunately not so recognized in the society except Eastern Region where its headquarters is situated.
So far Management consultancy has remained privilege of CA members. But in my opinion; CWA practising members are also good and they are doing great help to the Industry by advising them for cost controls and cost reduction which is in addition to cost ascertainment.
The issue is an old battle between the two. Due to ICAI's strong members position; it has more influence on ministry level.
CWA Institute was lacking in marketing of its course which it has realized now. Now it has increased its course fee and more students now choose CWA in comparison to MBA.
The moment CWA members are known as CMA; they would claim that they are more unique than MBAs. Because MBAs are the administrators ( on the basis of dictionary meaning they would be able to influence fresh students and their parents ) and thereby CMA members would claim they are real part of the Management.
ONE SHOULD FOCUS ON THE COURSE MATERIAL THAN THE NAME WHAT IS BEING USED.
Of course; CWA nomenclature is outdated and that is why it was changed to CMA in foreign countries.
(This is my personal opinion because I see all the courses from same angle - each course is unique in itself. The only thing which is required to be upgraded is the VISION about the course).