TDS U/S. 194C OR 194J
This query is : Resolved
26 February 2010
CAN ANYONE TELL ME WHETHER TDS IS DEDUCTIBLE U/S. 194C OR 194J IN FOLLOWING CASE WITH EXPLANATION:
PAYMENT IS MADE TO A COMPANY FOR A VISIT OF THEIR SERVICE ENGINEER TO ATTEND PROBLEM IN MACHINERY.
PAYMENT IS MADE TO A COMPANY FOR A VISIT OF THEIR SERVICE ENGINEER TO ATTEND PROBLEM IN MACHINERY.
26 February 2010
It will depend upon the what type of agreement u have entered.
as sec 194c is for contract and sub contract
and sec 194j is for payment of Royalty
So it will be covered under section 194c.
as sec 194c is for contract and sub contract
and sec 194j is for payment of Royalty
So it will be covered under section 194c.
26 February 2010
under 194C payment to contractor
26 February 2010
It is based on the service nature
02 March 2010
But sir payment is made to company who is providing services through engineers. Wouldnt it be covered under definition of "fees for technical services" and TDS liable u/s. 194J ?
02 March 2010
yes.Engineeing services covered under 194J only
03 March 2010
ok thanks
25 May 2010
I do not agree with the experts that the TDS would be required to be deducted u/s section 194J. The term “fee for technical services” has been defined in section 194J to mean as defined in explanation 2 to clause (vii) od subsection (1) of section 9 of IT Act. The said explanation is reproduced as following -
Explanation 77[2].—For the purposes of this clause, “fees for technical services” means any consideration (including any lump sum consideration) for the rendering of any managerial, technical or consultancy services (including the provision of services of technical or other personnel) but does not include consideration for any construction78, assembly, mining or like project undertaken by the recipient or consideration which would be income of the recipient chargeable under the head “Salaries”.]
From the perusal of above definition it is can be observed that the any consideration paid for construction, assembly, mining or like projects will not be considered fees for technical services. The point is distinction here is the like project, which means that the law intend to cover only those projects under technical services which are purely of service nature and not of the nature which provide the service which require a technical instrument / person to provide the services. A repair of a very technical machine may require a technically trained engineer to repair it, but he is not providing a technical service but repair services only which are covered under the exclusion clause of the explanation reproduced above. A cobble also possess technical skill, while mending shoes, he uses, his skill to mend / repair it, can he be called to provide a technical service. Similarly a person repairing a machine, can not be treated as providing the technical services.
Please let me know, if some one is having a differing view.
Explanation 77[2].—For the purposes of this clause, “fees for technical services” means any consideration (including any lump sum consideration) for the rendering of any managerial, technical or consultancy services (including the provision of services of technical or other personnel) but does not include consideration for any construction78, assembly, mining or like project undertaken by the recipient or consideration which would be income of the recipient chargeable under the head “Salaries”.]
From the perusal of above definition it is can be observed that the any consideration paid for construction, assembly, mining or like projects will not be considered fees for technical services. The point is distinction here is the like project, which means that the law intend to cover only those projects under technical services which are purely of service nature and not of the nature which provide the service which require a technical instrument / person to provide the services. A repair of a very technical machine may require a technically trained engineer to repair it, but he is not providing a technical service but repair services only which are covered under the exclusion clause of the explanation reproduced above. A cobble also possess technical skill, while mending shoes, he uses, his skill to mend / repair it, can he be called to provide a technical service. Similarly a person repairing a machine, can not be treated as providing the technical services.
Please let me know, if some one is having a differing view.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Is this income indian or foreign income?
- 15ca /15cb whose income tax login? remitter or nri seller's login?
- ITC temporary reversal and reclaim
- TDS U/S. 194NF
- GST on export of services and Input Credit
- Regarding Documentation & Compliances for Opening of Unit of Pvt Ltd.
- RCM applicability on Rent Paid by Registered Person to Unregistered Landlord for Residental Building
- Inventory of finished goods
- Applicable TDS rate for sale of property in Nov 2024
- Import license renewal
- LAST YEAR 2022-23 ITC IN NEXT YEAR 2023-24 REPORITNG IN GSTR-9
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- IGST Credit-Show cause notice issued-confusion
- Issue of gst e invoice
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- Regarding einvoice taken on nil rated sales
- Strategical investment in Public listed company
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
