Sec 44ad
This query is : Resolved
29 July 2014
whether a firm having nil turnover for FY 2013-14 should go for sec 44AD presumptive tax or Sec 44AB tax audit..The firm is having 250000 loss for the year ?
29 July 2014
No
29 July 2014
It should go for the audit.
The logic is that where you are claiming less than 8% profit (ie 8% of ZERO), audit is compulsory.
The logic is that where you are claiming less than 8% profit (ie 8% of ZERO), audit is compulsory.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- IT Return filed defective u/s 139 (9)
- Fixed Deposit Claim Relinquishment by the Nominee
- ITR 6 Schedule CFL and UD Issues
- NR GST NUMBER
- For REQUIRE INDIVIDUAL GST
- Not a CA , can we prepare balance sheet
- FREELANCING ACCOUNTANT
- GST Form ADT-02
- TCS ON SOFTWARE SALES
- Income Type for interest from government bonds
- Query Regarding on TDS section 194H and 194J
- TDS on purchase of value vouchers for employees ?
- PAYMENT TO OPEN AI AND ENVATO ELEMENT
- From 15CA for remittance by domestic travel agent by to Foreign Destination Management Company.
- Issue of gst e invoice
- Interchangeable words in accounts
- Adjusted profit/Loss in the case of LLP and Pvt. Ltd.company
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
Trending Online Classes
-
Excel Mastery Program
CA Rishabh Pugalia
CAclubindia
