Outstanding demand for previous years
This query is : Open
30 November 2015
Dear Experts,
There are numerous cases coming for demand outstanding for Salaried Employees in the assesses account due to wrong pan mentioned by employer while filling their TDS return.
Now the problem is that the Employer are not ready to revise Tds return or making excuse for the same.
On the other hand department is not convinced on Form 16 only. They sent this for verification with employer, even after verification they are making escuse agin .
What remedies are available to assessee or professionals in these cases.
What should be the approach to resolve these issues.
There are numerous cases coming for demand outstanding for Salaried Employees in the assesses account due to wrong pan mentioned by employer while filling their TDS return.
Now the problem is that the Employer are not ready to revise Tds return or making excuse for the same.
On the other hand department is not convinced on Form 16 only. They sent this for verification with employer, even after verification they are making escuse agin .
What remedies are available to assessee or professionals in these cases.
What should be the approach to resolve these issues.
02 December 2015
dear experts,
what is a set of proceedure to be adopted in such issues..please help
what is a set of proceedure to be adopted in such issues..please help
08 December 2015
One way is to write to ITO(TDS) of appropriate jurisdiction explaining him the whole matter and request him to take appropriate action against the employer. Also provide a copy of this letter to the jurisdictional ITO who is not accepting form 16.
Message likes :
1 times
08 December 2015
But the Jurisdictional AO does not pay any attention even after notifying the ITO (TDS) Is there any case law that or CBDT Circular that clearly says that assessee may not be harassed if he has form 16.
09 December 2015
Yes there is a judgment of Delhi High court in Court on its own motion vs UOI in which the Delhi High court has directed that refund can be claimed if the assessee has form 16 and that he must not be harrassed if TDS return is not correctly filled by deductor. CBDT has also issued circulars in compliance of this HC order. You may mention this judgment and CBDT circular in your application to AO.
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- GST Regis.
- Inventory of finished goods
- Sale of property furniture sale
- Clarification on Documentation of Paid-Up Capital Contribution by Directors
- Quiery in relation to GST liability in case of an advocate who has obtained GST registration.
- Disallowance of Section 43B(h) to sez units
- Confusion around Form 26QB fields
- Applicability of Ind As to associate of associate
- Should I include march foreign salary received in April in my income for FY 2023-24?
- Bogus purchase treatment for it act gst dealer
- Company Incorporation - CA and directors signing from different states
- Filing of Form 10BB instead of Filing Form 10B
- HSN Details in IFF/GSTR-1 & in GSTR 9
- LAST YEAR 2022-23 ITC IN NEXT YEAR 2023-24 REPORITNG IN GSTR-9
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- IGST Credit-Show cause notice issued-confusion
- Issue of gst e invoice
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
