Notice
This query is : Resolved
30 July 2013
Notice demanding rs 20000 for late filing of service tax return. Is there any way by which penalty can be waived. Any circural
31 July 2013
WAIVER OF PENALTY ARISES IF NON PAYMENT IS DUE TO BONAFIDE REASON
Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 provides that notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of Section 76, Section 77 or Section 78, no penalty shall be imposable on the assessee for any failure referred to in the said provisions if the assessee proves that there was reasonable cause for the said failure. Section 76 provides penalty for failure of to pay service tax. This section imposes a penalty which shall not less than two hundred rupees for every day during which such failure continues or at the rate of two per cent of such tax per month whichever is higher, starting with the first day after the due date till the date of actual payment of the outstanding amount of service tax. The total amount of the penalty payable in terms of this section shall not exceed the service tax payable. Section 77 provides for penalty for contravention of Rules and provisions of Act for which no penalty is specified elsewhere. This section imposes penalty which may extend to five thousand rupees. Section 78 provides for penalty for suppressing the value of taxable service. This section imposes penalty which shall not be less than but which shall not exceed twice the amount of service tax so not levied or paid or short levied or short paid or erroneously refunded.
Section 80 provides the assessee with an opportunity to defend himself against the penalties imposed on him. He is to prove to the satisfaction of the Central Excise Authorities that failure on his part was due to reasonable cause.
In 'Commissioner of Central Excise, Ludhiana V. Star Cargo Consultant' - [2009 -TMI - 34134 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI] the tribunal held that waiver of penalty arises if non payment is due to bona fide reason. In this case the respondents have service tax registration for Cargo Handling Services since 2003. In the balance sheet for the year 2004-05 of the respondents it was found by the Central Excise Officers that a receipt of the amount of Rs. 4,23,393/- was shown as rebate. This amount is received from custodian/contractors as compensation for not performing certain jobs which ultimately had been performed by the respondents. The Department took the view that this amount is to be treated as their receipt for providing the taxable service. The respondent deposited the service tax along with the interest. The Department subsequently issued a show cause notice for confirming the demand of service tax. The Dy. Commissioner vide order-in-original besides confirming the service tax and interest imposed penalty equal to service tax confirmed under Section 76, penalty of Rs. 1,000 under Section 77 and equal amount of service tax under Section 78. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the imposition of penalty under Section 76, 77 and 78 on the ground that the entire amount of service tax had been paid prior to the issue of show cause notice.
The Revenue filed appeal against the order of Commissioner (Appeals) before tribunal. The following pleadings are put forth by the Department:
> The only provision for waiving the penalty under Section 76 or 78 is Section 80 for which assessee has to show that there was genuine reason for delay in payment of service tax on non payment of service tax against which has not been invoked in this case by the Commissioner (Appeals);
> The payment of service tax prior to the issue of show cause notice cannot be ground for setting aside the penalty;
> There is no automatic waiver of the penalty when the service tax has been paid prior to the issue of show cause notice.
The respondent pleaded the following:
> This amount had not been received from the client to whom the Cargo Handling Service was provided but had been received from the contractors custodian as compensation for not doing certain jobs which they were supposed to perform, as a result of which those jobs had to be performed by the respondent and for this reason, only this amount had not been declared in the returns and no service tax has been paid;
> The service tax was paid immediately on pointing out by the Department;
> In the course of hearing before the Asst. Commissioner the reason as to why the service tax has not been paid on the amount had been explained;
> In view of the above penalty may not be imposed;
> It is a fit case for invoking Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994
The tribunal considered the submissions from both the sides. The factual position that the amount has been received from the contractors/custodian and not from the clients is not in dispute. As per the Department interpretation, the amount has to be treated as amount received for taxable service provided by the respondent to their clients as when the respondent received this amount as compensation from the contractors/custodian for failure to perform certain jobs, those jobs had been performed by them. The contention of the respondent is that there was confusion as to whether this amount would attract service tax or not and for this reason only they did not pay the service tax on this amount. The tribunal is of the view that on this case waiver of penalty in terms of the provisions of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 should have been considered by the lower authority but there are no findings on this point in the impugned order. The tribunal agrees that waiver of penalty cannot be granted just because the service tax had been paid prior to the issue of show cause notice. But if the non payment of service was due to some bona fide reason on the part of the assessee and the assessee on being pointed out paid the service tax, the waiver of penalty under Section 76, 77 or 78 would be merited. The same has not been considered in the impugned order and therefore the tribunal remanded the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for considering as to whether in view of the facts of the case, waiver of penalty under Section 76, 77 & 78 was warranted under Section 80 of the Finance Act.
If you are not fulfilling any of the above conditions then you have to file appeal against the penalty order and in appeal arguments you can place your grounds and the appellant authorities can either reduce or waive the penalty.
Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 provides that notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of Section 76, Section 77 or Section 78, no penalty shall be imposable on the assessee for any failure referred to in the said provisions if the assessee proves that there was reasonable cause for the said failure. Section 76 provides penalty for failure of to pay service tax. This section imposes a penalty which shall not less than two hundred rupees for every day during which such failure continues or at the rate of two per cent of such tax per month whichever is higher, starting with the first day after the due date till the date of actual payment of the outstanding amount of service tax. The total amount of the penalty payable in terms of this section shall not exceed the service tax payable. Section 77 provides for penalty for contravention of Rules and provisions of Act for which no penalty is specified elsewhere. This section imposes penalty which may extend to five thousand rupees. Section 78 provides for penalty for suppressing the value of taxable service. This section imposes penalty which shall not be less than but which shall not exceed twice the amount of service tax so not levied or paid or short levied or short paid or erroneously refunded.
Section 80 provides the assessee with an opportunity to defend himself against the penalties imposed on him. He is to prove to the satisfaction of the Central Excise Authorities that failure on his part was due to reasonable cause.
In 'Commissioner of Central Excise, Ludhiana V. Star Cargo Consultant' - [2009 -TMI - 34134 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI] the tribunal held that waiver of penalty arises if non payment is due to bona fide reason. In this case the respondents have service tax registration for Cargo Handling Services since 2003. In the balance sheet for the year 2004-05 of the respondents it was found by the Central Excise Officers that a receipt of the amount of Rs. 4,23,393/- was shown as rebate. This amount is received from custodian/contractors as compensation for not performing certain jobs which ultimately had been performed by the respondents. The Department took the view that this amount is to be treated as their receipt for providing the taxable service. The respondent deposited the service tax along with the interest. The Department subsequently issued a show cause notice for confirming the demand of service tax. The Dy. Commissioner vide order-in-original besides confirming the service tax and interest imposed penalty equal to service tax confirmed under Section 76, penalty of Rs. 1,000 under Section 77 and equal amount of service tax under Section 78. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the imposition of penalty under Section 76, 77 and 78 on the ground that the entire amount of service tax had been paid prior to the issue of show cause notice.
The Revenue filed appeal against the order of Commissioner (Appeals) before tribunal. The following pleadings are put forth by the Department:
> The only provision for waiving the penalty under Section 76 or 78 is Section 80 for which assessee has to show that there was genuine reason for delay in payment of service tax on non payment of service tax against which has not been invoked in this case by the Commissioner (Appeals);
> The payment of service tax prior to the issue of show cause notice cannot be ground for setting aside the penalty;
> There is no automatic waiver of the penalty when the service tax has been paid prior to the issue of show cause notice.
The respondent pleaded the following:
> This amount had not been received from the client to whom the Cargo Handling Service was provided but had been received from the contractors custodian as compensation for not doing certain jobs which they were supposed to perform, as a result of which those jobs had to be performed by the respondent and for this reason, only this amount had not been declared in the returns and no service tax has been paid;
> The service tax was paid immediately on pointing out by the Department;
> In the course of hearing before the Asst. Commissioner the reason as to why the service tax has not been paid on the amount had been explained;
> In view of the above penalty may not be imposed;
> It is a fit case for invoking Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994
The tribunal considered the submissions from both the sides. The factual position that the amount has been received from the contractors/custodian and not from the clients is not in dispute. As per the Department interpretation, the amount has to be treated as amount received for taxable service provided by the respondent to their clients as when the respondent received this amount as compensation from the contractors/custodian for failure to perform certain jobs, those jobs had been performed by them. The contention of the respondent is that there was confusion as to whether this amount would attract service tax or not and for this reason only they did not pay the service tax on this amount. The tribunal is of the view that on this case waiver of penalty in terms of the provisions of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 should have been considered by the lower authority but there are no findings on this point in the impugned order. The tribunal agrees that waiver of penalty cannot be granted just because the service tax had been paid prior to the issue of show cause notice. But if the non payment of service was due to some bona fide reason on the part of the assessee and the assessee on being pointed out paid the service tax, the waiver of penalty under Section 76, 77 or 78 would be merited. The same has not been considered in the impugned order and therefore the tribunal remanded the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for considering as to whether in view of the facts of the case, waiver of penalty under Section 76, 77 & 78 was warranted under Section 80 of the Finance Act.
If you are not fulfilling any of the above conditions then you have to file appeal against the penalty order and in appeal arguments you can place your grounds and the appellant authorities can either reduce or waive the penalty.
10 August 2013
SIR MANY MANY THANKS, BUT BANK PAID SERVICE TAX BUT DID NOT FILE ST3 FOR FY201112 WITHIN DUE DATE. WHICH FILED ON 30/03/2013. SERVICE TAX PAID FOR THIS PERIOD IS ABOUT 14000. THEREFORE PENALTY OF 20000 HAS BEEN IMPOSED BESIDES INTEREST OF RS. 306. WHAT IS RELIEF FOR MINIMUM PENALTY OR WAIVE OF PENALTY. BRANCH IS IN RURAL AREA WITH LESS MEANS OF CUMMUNICATION AND INSUFFICIENT NUMBER OF STAFF. PL REFER CASE LAW ALSO. THANKING YOU AGAIN
04 August 2024
To address the issue of a penalty for late filing of a Service Tax return, here's a structured approach to potentially reduce or waive the penalty:
### **Steps to Address Penalty for Late Filing:**
1. **Understand the Penalty:**
- **Penalty Amount:** The penalty imposed is Rs. 20,000 for late filing of ST-3 (Service Tax return) for the financial year 2011-12. Additionally, there's interest of Rs. 306.
- **Interest and Penalty:** Interest is levied for the late payment of Service Tax, whereas penalties are for the late filing of the return.
2. **Review Relevant Circulars and Notifications:**
- **CBEC Circular:** The CBEC (Central Board of Excise and Customs) often issues circulars regarding penalties and their waivers. For the period in question, refer to Circular No. 175/7/2014-ST dated 10th December 2014, which discusses penalties for late filing and potential relief.
- **Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme (VCES), 2013:** This scheme was introduced to encourage compliance by providing relief from penalties in certain cases. Check if you can invoke any provisions under VCES if applicable.
3. **File a Petition for Penalty Reduction:**
- **Prepare a Letter:** Draft a letter to the jurisdictional Service Tax Officer explaining the circumstances for the delay. Highlight the following:
- **Reason for Delay:** Provide a detailed explanation of the delay, such as rural location, insufficient staff, and limited communication means.
- **Payment of Tax:** Mention that the Service Tax for the period was paid on time.
- **Request for Waiver:** Request a reduction or waiver of the penalty, emphasizing your commitment to compliance and the hardships faced.
- **Submit Supporting Documents:** Include any relevant documents or evidence supporting your claim, such as proof of tax payment and details of the communication constraints.
4. **Review and Compliance:**
- **Ensure Compliance:** Verify that all future returns and payments are made timely to avoid similar issues.
- **Consult with a Tax Professional:** Seek advice from a tax professional or consultant who can help in drafting the petition and ensuring all relevant points are covered.
5. **Case Laws and Precedents:**
- **Relevant Case Laws:** While case laws can provide some insight, specific reliefs are often given based on the facts of the case. Look for judgments where penalties were reduced due to genuine hardships or administrative delays.
### **Sample Letter for Penalty Reduction Request:**
Here’s a sample letter template to request a reduction or waiver of the penalty:
---
**[Your Name]**
**[Your Address]**
**[City, State, PIN Code]**
**[Email Address]**
**[Phone Number]**
**Date:** [DD/MM/YYYY]
**To,**
**The Superintendent/Assistant Commissioner**
**[Service Tax Office Address]**
**[City, State, PIN Code]**
**Subject: Request for Reduction/Waiver of Penalty for Late Filing of ST-3 Return for FY 2011-12**
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to request a reduction or waiver of the penalty amounting to Rs. 20,000 imposed for the late filing of the ST-3 return for the financial year 2011-12.
Due to the constraints of operating in a rural area, our branch faced significant challenges, including limited means of communication and insufficient staffing. As a result, the return was filed late, although the Service Tax for the period was duly paid on time.
We have since taken steps to ensure timely filing and compliance with all regulatory requirements. Considering the circumstances and our commitment to rectify the issue, I kindly request a reconsideration of the penalty imposed.
Enclosed with this letter are the following documents for your reference:
- Proof of Service Tax payment
- Any relevant correspondence
I appreciate your understanding and consideration in this matter.
Thank you.
Yours faithfully,
**[Your Name]**
---
### **Conclusion:**
By preparing a well-documented request and providing a valid reason for the delay, you can increase your chances of obtaining relief from the penalty. Consult with a tax advisor if needed to strengthen your case and ensure all aspects are addressed.
### **Steps to Address Penalty for Late Filing:**
1. **Understand the Penalty:**
- **Penalty Amount:** The penalty imposed is Rs. 20,000 for late filing of ST-3 (Service Tax return) for the financial year 2011-12. Additionally, there's interest of Rs. 306.
- **Interest and Penalty:** Interest is levied for the late payment of Service Tax, whereas penalties are for the late filing of the return.
2. **Review Relevant Circulars and Notifications:**
- **CBEC Circular:** The CBEC (Central Board of Excise and Customs) often issues circulars regarding penalties and their waivers. For the period in question, refer to Circular No. 175/7/2014-ST dated 10th December 2014, which discusses penalties for late filing and potential relief.
- **Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme (VCES), 2013:** This scheme was introduced to encourage compliance by providing relief from penalties in certain cases. Check if you can invoke any provisions under VCES if applicable.
3. **File a Petition for Penalty Reduction:**
- **Prepare a Letter:** Draft a letter to the jurisdictional Service Tax Officer explaining the circumstances for the delay. Highlight the following:
- **Reason for Delay:** Provide a detailed explanation of the delay, such as rural location, insufficient staff, and limited communication means.
- **Payment of Tax:** Mention that the Service Tax for the period was paid on time.
- **Request for Waiver:** Request a reduction or waiver of the penalty, emphasizing your commitment to compliance and the hardships faced.
- **Submit Supporting Documents:** Include any relevant documents or evidence supporting your claim, such as proof of tax payment and details of the communication constraints.
4. **Review and Compliance:**
- **Ensure Compliance:** Verify that all future returns and payments are made timely to avoid similar issues.
- **Consult with a Tax Professional:** Seek advice from a tax professional or consultant who can help in drafting the petition and ensuring all relevant points are covered.
5. **Case Laws and Precedents:**
- **Relevant Case Laws:** While case laws can provide some insight, specific reliefs are often given based on the facts of the case. Look for judgments where penalties were reduced due to genuine hardships or administrative delays.
### **Sample Letter for Penalty Reduction Request:**
Here’s a sample letter template to request a reduction or waiver of the penalty:
---
**[Your Name]**
**[Your Address]**
**[City, State, PIN Code]**
**[Email Address]**
**[Phone Number]**
**Date:** [DD/MM/YYYY]
**To,**
**The Superintendent/Assistant Commissioner**
**[Service Tax Office Address]**
**[City, State, PIN Code]**
**Subject: Request for Reduction/Waiver of Penalty for Late Filing of ST-3 Return for FY 2011-12**
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to request a reduction or waiver of the penalty amounting to Rs. 20,000 imposed for the late filing of the ST-3 return for the financial year 2011-12.
Due to the constraints of operating in a rural area, our branch faced significant challenges, including limited means of communication and insufficient staffing. As a result, the return was filed late, although the Service Tax for the period was duly paid on time.
We have since taken steps to ensure timely filing and compliance with all regulatory requirements. Considering the circumstances and our commitment to rectify the issue, I kindly request a reconsideration of the penalty imposed.
Enclosed with this letter are the following documents for your reference:
- Proof of Service Tax payment
- Any relevant correspondence
I appreciate your understanding and consideration in this matter.
Thank you.
Yours faithfully,
**[Your Name]**
---
### **Conclusion:**
By preparing a well-documented request and providing a valid reason for the delay, you can increase your chances of obtaining relief from the penalty. Consult with a tax advisor if needed to strengthen your case and ensure all aspects are addressed.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- REGARDING GST ON COMMERICIAL PROPERTY
- Is this income indian or foreign income?
- 15ca /15cb whose income tax login? remitter or nri seller's login?
- GST on export of services and Input Credit
- RCM applicability on Rent Paid by Registered Person to Unregistered Landlord for Residental Building
- TDS U/S. 194NF
- ITC temporary reversal and reclaim
- Regarding Documentation & Compliances for Opening of Unit of Pvt Ltd.
- Applicable TDS rate for sale of property in Nov 2024
- Should I report my US salary for January, February, March in Schedule FA?
- LAST YEAR 2022-23 ITC IN NEXT YEAR 2023-24 REPORITNG IN GSTR-9
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- IGST Credit-Show cause notice issued-confusion
- Issue of gst e invoice
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- Regarding einvoice taken on nil rated sales
- Strategical investment in Public listed company
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
