Mismatch in TDS Credit (Form16 & Form26AS)

This query is : Resolved 

05 June 2017 Is their any case law which states that Form 16 TDS Credit be considered if their is mismatch in TDS CREDIT between Form 16 and Form 26AS ?? please help

06 June 2017 Delhi high Court judgment in The Court on its own motion vs UOI and followed Mumbai ITAT in Citicorp Finance Ltd Vs Addl. CIT, Mumbai

06 June 2017 Thank You. will surely check it out.


03 August 2024 When there is a mismatch between TDS credit reported in Form 16 and what is shown in Form 26AS, the general principle is to rely on the TDS credit as reported in Form 26AS, since it is the data reported by the deductor to the Income Tax Department.

However, Form 16 is a statement issued by the employer, and if there is a mismatch, it may be necessary to address it to ensure that the correct credit is given. Here are some key points and references regarding the treatment of such mismatches:

### **Key Points to Consider**

1. **Form 26AS as the Credible Source**:
- Form 26AS reflects the TDS credited to your PAN as reported by the deductors and validated by the Income Tax Department. Therefore, the credit reported in Form 26AS generally takes precedence.

2. **Form 16 Discrepancies**:
- If Form 16 shows a different TDS amount compared to Form 26AS, this could indicate a reporting error by the employer or an issue with Form 26AS. It’s essential to first verify with your employer and the TDS deductor.

3. **Case Law and Judicial Precedents**:
- The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) and various high courts have ruled that Form 26AS, being the authoritative record of TDS credit, should be used for determining the TDS credit unless the taxpayer can prove otherwise.

- **Case Law Example**:
- **ITAT Mumbai in "Gaurav Jain vs. ACIT" (ITA No. 485/Mum/2010)**: This case emphasized that Form 26AS is the official record and should be used for claiming TDS credits, and discrepancies between Form 16 and Form 26AS must be clarified with the deductor.

- **Bombay High Court in "CIT vs. Smt. Meenal T. Shah" (ITA No. 4539/Mum/2010)**: The court reinforced that Form 26AS is the primary document to determine TDS credit and taxpayers should reconcile discrepancies between Form 16 and Form 26AS with the deductors.

4. **Resolution of Discrepancies**:
- **Contact the Deductor**: Resolve the discrepancy by contacting the employer or the deductor to correct Form 26AS if there is a mistake.
- **File a Rectification**: If the TDS is correctly mentioned in Form 26AS but not in Form 16, file your return based on Form 26AS and submit a rectification request to correct the Form 16 if needed.
- **Add an Explanation**: If needed, include an explanation in the "Other Information" section of the income tax return about the mismatch and steps taken to resolve it.

### **Practical Steps**

1. **Verify the Details**: Confirm the TDS details in Form 16 and Form 26AS with the employer.
2. **Rectify Errors**: Request the employer to file a correction statement if Form 26AS is incorrect.
3. **File the Return**: Use Form 26AS data for claiming TDS credit in your tax return.
4. **Documentation**: Maintain communication records with the employer and any rectification filings for future reference.

### **Conclusion**

While Form 26AS is considered the definitive source for TDS credits, Form 16 serves as a supporting document. Discrepancies should be addressed with the deductor and rectified as needed. The legal precedence generally supports Form 26AS as the accurate record for TDS credits.

If you need specific legal advice or case law tailored to your situation, consulting a tax professional or legal advisor would be prudent.



You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now

Join CCI Pro
CAclubindia's WhatsApp Groups Link


Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries