Is an article assistant an employee?

This query is : Resolved 

18 January 2010 Please confirm if an article assistant under the ICAI Act also an employee as per the following Acts:
1. Income Tax Act, 1961
2. EPF and Misc. Provisions Act, 1952
3. The Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972
4. The Payment of Bonus Act, 1965

Also quote relevant sections used as a base for your comments.

18 January 2010 I dont have any support for supporting my view but it can not be done. Article can not be employee somewhere else leaglly speaking

18 January 2010 Requesting inputs from others......


01 August 2024 An article assistant under the ICAI Act is not typically considered an employee in the conventional sense as per several statutory Acts. Here’s how the status of an article assistant is viewed under different laws:

### 1. **Income Tax Act, 1961**

- **Status:** Article assistants are not treated as employees under the Income Tax Act.
- **Relevant Section:** The Income Tax Act does not specifically classify article assistants. They are generally considered as trainees or apprentices. Their stipend is usually treated as taxable income, and tax provisions applicable to individuals would apply.
- **Reference:** Section 10(14) allows for certain exemptions on allowances, but article assistants do not fall under specific exemptions related to employee benefits.

### 2. **EPF and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952**

- **Status:** Article assistants are not considered employees under the EPF Act.
- **Relevant Section:** The EPF Act, under Section 2(f), defines "employee" as a person employed for wages, and the term excludes trainees or apprentices. Article assistants, being apprentices under the ICAI Act, are not covered.
- **Reference:** Section 2(f) defines the term "employee" and excludes trainees and apprentices from its scope.

### 3. **The Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972**

- **Status:** Article assistants are not considered employees under the Payment of Gratuity Act.
- **Relevant Section:** The Payment of Gratuity Act defines "employee" under Section 2(e) and includes those who are employed for wages and other benefits. Article assistants are not covered as they are trainees and not permanent employees.
- **Reference:** Section 2(e) of the Act does not include apprentices or trainees.

### 4. **The Payment of Bonus Act, 1965**

- **Status:** Article assistants are not considered employees under the Payment of Bonus Act.
- **Relevant Section:** The Payment of Bonus Act, under Section 2(13), defines "employee" as someone employed for wages, excluding apprentices or those employed on a contract basis. Article assistants are typically not covered under this definition.
- **Reference:** Section 2(13) defines "employee" and excludes apprentices from the definition.

### Summary

- **Income Tax Act:** Article assistants are considered individuals whose stipend is taxable.
- **EPF Act:** Not covered as they are not considered employees under this Act.
- **Payment of Gratuity Act:** Not covered as they do not fall under the definition of "employee."
- **Payment of Bonus Act:** Not covered as they are classified as apprentices or trainees.

Article assistants under ICAI are essentially trainees gaining practical experience, and thus, they do not qualify for employee benefits under the above-mentioned Acts.



You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now

Join CCI Pro
CAclubindia's WhatsApp Groups Link


Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries