Interest charged at lower rate
This query is : Resolved
12 March 2015
that the assessee has taken loan @ 15% interest p.a. and loan given @ 12% interest charged p.a. That the A.O. made addition on difference as deemed interest income (3%). Addition made of difference 3% as deemed income and imposed penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of income tax. Now my query is that the deemed income should attract penalty u/s 271(1)(c) ? Any case / citaion if any supporting penalty cannot imposed.
12 March 2015
in case if 3% income was not disclosed as income in itr then penalty would be justified for concealment of income and not disclosing true and correct information willingly.
14 March 2015
We have disclosed all the facts. The amount was given from surplus fund. Borrowed amount as term loan for period 2 years. Interest given to those all were also filed Income Tax returns.
01 August 2024
To address your query about the imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on the deemed income due to the difference in interest rates on loans, it's important to understand the following points:
### Section 271(1)(c) - Penalty for Concealment of Income
Section 271(1)(c) deals with penalties for concealing income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. If an assessee has under-reported income or provided incorrect information, the Assessing Officer (A.O.) may impose a penalty.
### Deemed Income from Interest Rate Difference
The A.O. has added the difference in interest rates (3%) as deemed income and imposed a penalty under Section 271(1)(c). To contest this, you would need to demonstrate that there was no concealment or inaccurate furnishing of particulars of income.
### Arguments Against Penalty Imposition
1. **Full Disclosure**: If you have fully disclosed the facts regarding the interest rates in your income tax return, it can be argued that there was no concealment or misrepresentation.
2. **Commercial Expediency**: Loans provided at a lower interest rate might be justified based on commercial expediency. If the loans were given to related parties or for strategic business reasons, this could be a valid defense.
3. **No Malafide Intent**: Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) generally requires evidence of malafide intent. If the lower interest rate was due to genuine business transactions and not with the intent to evade taxes, this can be argued.
### Judicial Precedents
Several judicial precedents may support the argument that penalty under Section 271(1)(c) should not be imposed in cases of deemed income from interest rate differences:
1. **CIT vs. Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd. (2010) 322 ITR 158 (SC)**:
- The Supreme Court held that merely because the assessee had claimed the expenditure, which was not accepted by the Revenue, that by itself would not attract penalty under Section 271(1)(c). If the claim is made in a bona fide manner, the penalty cannot be imposed.
2. **CIT vs. S.P. Viz. (1996) 191 ITR 1 (SC)**:
- The Supreme Court held that penalty cannot be imposed merely because the A.O. does not agree with the explanation of the assessee.
3. **CIT vs. Vikas Promoters Pvt. Ltd. (2005) 277 ITR 337 (Delhi)**:
- The Delhi High Court held that penalty under Section 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed if the claim is bona fide and all material facts are disclosed in the return.
### Practical Steps
1. **Documentation**: Gather all documentation that supports the reason for the lower interest rate (e.g., Board resolutions, loan agreements, business justifications).
2. **File an Appeal**: If a penalty is imposed, you can file an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] and subsequently to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) if necessary.
3. **Consult a Professional**: Engage with a tax professional or a lawyer who can help build a strong case and represent you in appeals.
### Conclusion
Based on the precedents and the facts provided, if there is full disclosure and the transaction is bona fide without any malafide intent, the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) may be challenged. It is advisable to consult with a tax professional to prepare and present your case effectively.
If you need further assistance or a detailed review of your case, feel free to ask!
### Section 271(1)(c) - Penalty for Concealment of Income
Section 271(1)(c) deals with penalties for concealing income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. If an assessee has under-reported income or provided incorrect information, the Assessing Officer (A.O.) may impose a penalty.
### Deemed Income from Interest Rate Difference
The A.O. has added the difference in interest rates (3%) as deemed income and imposed a penalty under Section 271(1)(c). To contest this, you would need to demonstrate that there was no concealment or inaccurate furnishing of particulars of income.
### Arguments Against Penalty Imposition
1. **Full Disclosure**: If you have fully disclosed the facts regarding the interest rates in your income tax return, it can be argued that there was no concealment or misrepresentation.
2. **Commercial Expediency**: Loans provided at a lower interest rate might be justified based on commercial expediency. If the loans were given to related parties or for strategic business reasons, this could be a valid defense.
3. **No Malafide Intent**: Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) generally requires evidence of malafide intent. If the lower interest rate was due to genuine business transactions and not with the intent to evade taxes, this can be argued.
### Judicial Precedents
Several judicial precedents may support the argument that penalty under Section 271(1)(c) should not be imposed in cases of deemed income from interest rate differences:
1. **CIT vs. Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd. (2010) 322 ITR 158 (SC)**:
- The Supreme Court held that merely because the assessee had claimed the expenditure, which was not accepted by the Revenue, that by itself would not attract penalty under Section 271(1)(c). If the claim is made in a bona fide manner, the penalty cannot be imposed.
2. **CIT vs. S.P. Viz. (1996) 191 ITR 1 (SC)**:
- The Supreme Court held that penalty cannot be imposed merely because the A.O. does not agree with the explanation of the assessee.
3. **CIT vs. Vikas Promoters Pvt. Ltd. (2005) 277 ITR 337 (Delhi)**:
- The Delhi High Court held that penalty under Section 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed if the claim is bona fide and all material facts are disclosed in the return.
### Practical Steps
1. **Documentation**: Gather all documentation that supports the reason for the lower interest rate (e.g., Board resolutions, loan agreements, business justifications).
2. **File an Appeal**: If a penalty is imposed, you can file an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] and subsequently to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) if necessary.
3. **Consult a Professional**: Engage with a tax professional or a lawyer who can help build a strong case and represent you in appeals.
### Conclusion
Based on the precedents and the facts provided, if there is full disclosure and the transaction is bona fide without any malafide intent, the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) may be challenged. It is advisable to consult with a tax professional to prepare and present your case effectively.
If you need further assistance or a detailed review of your case, feel free to ask!
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Unanswered Queries
- After retirement
- Treatment of Car allowance
- 44AD PRESUMPTIVE RATE ON CREDIT SALES
- Dried Vegetable Sale from Rajasthan to MP, E-way Bill compulsory or not?
- Input tax credit on modular office kitchen
- Is GST threshold limit applicable for services by Indian firm, receipts receiving from foreign accou
- EWAY BILL BY SELLER TO MY BUYER DIRECTLY?
- Huge late fee, keep pending as Limited Liability Concept
- SECTION 50C(2) Valuation by valuation officer
- Wrong TDS Return
- Advt Expenses
- ITC of Insurance on Capital Electronic Goods
- Discontinuance of Interest and Salary to working partners
- SERVICE PROVIDER GST
- TIME LIMIT FOR AVAILMENT OF ITC LAYING IN ITC REVRSAL LEDGER
- Tally entry - Debit note
- Debit Note of GST amount
- Reposting my query kindly reply.
- Regarding ITC taken or not
- Gst registration in the state of maharashtra
Trending Online Classes
-
GST LIVE Certification Course - 42nd Weekend Batch(With Govt Certificate)
Industry Expert17 May 2025
CAclubindia
