Income tax refund
This query is : Resolved
02 August 2017
Is it tough to claim IT refunds from AY 2017-18 onwards??
02 August 2017
No.............
03 August 2017
On what basis you are asking
03 August 2017
If we have claimed more deductions than what we have.. Is it possible to get income tax refund from AY 2017-18 onwards?? Because Dept is issuing notices u/s 143(1)a which asks about clarifications..
03 August 2017
@anil.,
Your query is not cleared.......
So, only can't understand this one for here and also other forums created by you.....
03 August 2017
If you have receipt of deduction then no problem will occur in getting refunds.
03 August 2017
143(1)(a) processing does not go into whether you have claimed excess deduction or not. it checks for general arithmetical accuracy and basic prima facie errors.
so you will get the refund. however, depending on parameters if the case is selected for scrutiny or limited scrutiny then you may have to provide proof for deduction claimed.
so you will get the refund. however, depending on parameters if the case is selected for scrutiny or limited scrutiny then you may have to provide proof for deduction claimed.
03 August 2017
If we have claimed more deductions than what we have.. Is it possible to get income tax refund from AY 2017-18 onwards?? Because Dept is issuing notices u/s 143(1)a which asks about clarifications..
Boss, I fail to understand why we should claim deduction more than what we have?
If we have claimed more deductions than what we have.. Is it possible to get income tax refund from AY 2017-18 onwards?? Because Dept is issuing notices u/s 143(1)a which asks about clarifications..
Boss, I fail to understand why we should claim deduction more than what we have?
03 August 2017
Mr. Anil, what you say is correct in the sense that this year (Asst. Year-2017-18) , 143(1) notice have been received by many assesses asking them to explain under the "e-proceedings" if the ITR figures does not match with Form-16. There are genuine cases where you would not have declared some investments to your employer before the due date declared by the employer for inclusion. in that cases you would have claimed additional deduction under the respective heads, like 80-C , 80-D, etc. Those cases are picked up by the Department and 143((1) intimations are issued. Even in cases where ITR figures and Form-16 figures matches , the Department is issuing 143(1) asking the Assesses to explain the difference under e-proceeding, where there is no difference and no additional deduction. It really pitiable how an assesse will explain imaginary difference!!!!
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Applicability
- Where to show the RCM on Rent paid to unregistered landlord
- Is Aadhar PAN linking required for opening bank account?
- CPC Processing IT Return for AY 2023-24 without recognizing the Taxation Option under New Regime
- TDS NUMBER SURRENDER
- Gst Sales of FY 2023-24
- Offsetting interest income against derivative trading losses
- Application of 115BAC
- Legal heir raised refund , but refund issued to the closed account of deceased.
- RCM - commercial rent paid to URP under GST
- Whether still royalty
- 20% OF DEMAND PAYMENT IN APPEAL
- Issue of gst e invoice
- Interchangeable words in accounts
- Adjusted profit/Loss in the case of LLP and Pvt. Ltd.company
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- Regarding Resignation by Auditor from Pvt. Ltd.
Trending Online Classes
-
Excel Mastery Program
CA Rishabh Pugalia
CAclubindia
