FBT - Min. number of Employees
This query is : Resolved
13 March 2009
Dear Sir,
It is a known fact that in case there is no employee in Company FBT cannot be levied however I have following two queries and sought expert views on the same :
1. Will a Company be held liable for FBT on expenses {of the type covered by Sec. 115WB (2)} in case it has just one employee on the rolls of the Company?(as the definition used says "Company should have employees in India"
2. The Company has incurred some expenses which are liable for FBT but didn’t had any employee. Subsequently it appoints one/two employee in the Company. Whether FBT will be levied on the expenses {of the type covered by Sec. 115WB (2)} incurred from the date the employee joins the organisation or from the first date of the financial year?
It is a known fact that in case there is no employee in Company FBT cannot be levied however I have following two queries and sought expert views on the same :
1. Will a Company be held liable for FBT on expenses {of the type covered by Sec. 115WB (2)} in case it has just one employee on the rolls of the Company?(as the definition used says "Company should have employees in India"
2. The Company has incurred some expenses which are liable for FBT but didn’t had any employee. Subsequently it appoints one/two employee in the Company. Whether FBT will be levied on the expenses {of the type covered by Sec. 115WB (2)} incurred from the date the employee joins the organisation or from the first date of the financial year?
13 March 2009
Even if one employee is there then FBT will be attracted.
If no employee is there at the time of spending the expenditure then that expenditure will not attract FBT. But if no employees are there to whom this expenses has been spent will be question of ITO which you should be in a poistion to answer.
If no employee is there at the time of spending the expenditure then that expenditure will not attract FBT. But if no employees are there to whom this expenses has been spent will be question of ITO which you should be in a poistion to answer.
16 March 2009
Dear Sir,
Thanx for your advice, I hope Directors of the Company are not considered as Employees for the purpose of FBT. So if Director of a Company making an expense in the nature of for example Entertainment Expense I think it will not attract FBT.
Thanx for your advice, I hope Directors of the Company are not considered as Employees for the purpose of FBT. So if Director of a Company making an expense in the nature of for example Entertainment Expense I think it will not attract FBT.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- GST Regis.
- Tax on capital gains revoked us 54f
- Should I include march foreign salary received in April in my income for FY 2023-24?
- Inventory of finished goods
- Filing of Form 10BB instead of Filing Form 10B
- Confusion around Form 26QB fields
- Applicability of Ind As to associate of associate
- Clarification on Documentation of Paid-Up Capital Contribution by Directors
- Refund of AY 22-23
- Disallowance of Section 43B(h) to sez units
- GST Registration Cancellation books of accounts asked by officer
- TDS Deduction Online Learing Platform
- Point (III) 9 of GSTR-9C
- As per our records, find the below outstanding demand(s)* and interest payable u/s 220(2):
- Regarding transaction th. credit card
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
