director remuneration
This query is : Resolved
15 July 2010
We are doing the audit of a small comany.Here no systematic monthly remuneration is paid to directors.With the amount of Directors expenses like children school fees etc director Remuneration booked.Is this right?
Whether any objection can be raised on it?
Is any provision of Co. Law or Sch VI attracted?
Whether any objection can be raised on it?
Is any provision of Co. Law or Sch VI attracted?
15 July 2010
The system fllowed by the Company is not correct. A Company should fix director remuneration and the same should be approved by the board by passing a resolution. The Company should pay the amount to director fixed by the Board in their Board Meeting.
15 July 2010
Agreed with the learned expert.
But still Companies are doing these ( basically Pvt. Ltd Companies.)
If you are an auditor of such Company then you can raise a question as to substantiate the Payments made to Directors ( i.e. Board resolution in this behalf)
If the resolutions are there and the same mentions clearly the structure of Directors Remuneration.
if there are no such resolutions you can put a question mark on the management.
Also refer to Companies Act Section 309,310 for the limit, etc.
But still Companies are doing these ( basically Pvt. Ltd Companies.)
If you are an auditor of such Company then you can raise a question as to substantiate the Payments made to Directors ( i.e. Board resolution in this behalf)
If the resolutions are there and the same mentions clearly the structure of Directors Remuneration.
if there are no such resolutions you can put a question mark on the management.
Also refer to Companies Act Section 309,310 for the limit, etc.
15 July 2010
In my opinion Private Co can do so. through there current account. They can withdraw against their remuneration as per their needs. Once the remuneration is fixed by board it is up to the director how he uses and withdraw the same.
Important thing is to check is that he may not withdraw more than its remuneration due. Otherwise 2(22)e of IT is attracted.
Important thing is to check is that he may not withdraw more than its remuneration due. Otherwise 2(22)e of IT is attracted.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- REGARDING GST ON COMMERICIAL PROPERTY
- Is this income indian or foreign income?
- 15ca /15cb whose income tax login? remitter or nri seller's login?
- Regarding Documentation & Compliances for Opening of Unit of Pvt Ltd.
- RCM applicability on Rent Paid by Registered Person to Unregistered Landlord for Residental Building
- TDS U/S. 194NF
- ITC temporary reversal and reclaim
- GST on export of services and Input Credit
- Applicable TDS rate for sale of property in Nov 2024
- Donation Receipt u/s 80G
- TDS deduction (debit notes)
- Can a partnership firm become partner in a LLP ?
- Quiery in relation to GST liability in case of an advocate who has obtained GST registration.
- LAST YEAR 2022-23 ITC IN NEXT YEAR 2023-24 REPORITNG IN GSTR-9
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- IGST Credit-Show cause notice issued-confusion
- TDS on purchase of value vouchers for employees ?
- Issue of gst e invoice
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
