Deduction U/s 80 IB
This query is : Resolved
27 September 2007
Dear Sir,
We are manufacturer & Sale of Processing of food (Ready to eat snack) i.e. Potato Chips like lays. in Palda Indore, From July - 2004.
our qt.is :-
Are we eligible of deducting U/s 80-IB ?
We are manufacturer & Sale of Processing of food (Ready to eat snack) i.e. Potato Chips like lays. in Palda Indore, From July - 2004.
our qt.is :-
Are we eligible of deducting U/s 80-IB ?
27 September 2007
28 September 2007
tell the location of your industry .....with dag no , patta no etc??
28 September 2007
whether started with new plant and machineriers???
28 September 2007
Situated at : khasra no. 387/1/4, Nemawar Road, Gram; Palda, Dist: Indore (M.P.)
and in July 2004 we have started the commercial production with new plant & machinery.
and in July 2004 we have started the commercial production with new plant & machinery.
05 October 2007
Situated at : khasra no. 387/1/4, Nemawar Road, Gram; Palda, Dist: Indore (M.P.)
and in July 2004 we have started the commercial production with new plant & machinery.
and in July 2004 we have started the commercial production with new plant & machinery.
12 October 2007
Manufacture/Production
General tests - Manufacture and processing are not clearly demarcated fields. The test of manufacture lies in the answer to the question whether what is processed or produced as the end-product is commercially known as a different product from the materials out of which it is so produced. Therefore, if the product has a different name and is identified by the buyers and sellers as a different product and is bought and sold as a distinct product from its raw materials, one can say that it is a manufactured product. There may be some room for debate as to whether this test is fully satisfied by edibles that come as end-products from the raw materials out of which they are made. But the expression ‘produce’ has to be taken in a more liberal sense than manufacture. If the end-product is different, that by itself would suffice to meet the requirement of ‘producing’. Hence, an exclusive catering unit of a hotel supplying eatables in bulk for consumption by air passengers will be eligible for relief - CIT v. East India Hotels Ltd. [1994] 209 ITR 854 (Cal.).
Provision must be construed liberally - A provision in the taxing statute granting incentives for promoting growth and development should be construed liberally. Since a provision intended for promoting economic growth has to be interpreted liberally, the restriction on it too has to be construed so as to advance the objective of the provision and not to frustrate it - Bajaj Tempo Ltd. v. CIT [1992] 62 Taxman 480 (SC).
CONSIDERING WHETHER YOU MEET OTHER ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA , YOU HAVE TO TAKE A DECISION ON THE BASIS OF ABOVE CASES
General tests - Manufacture and processing are not clearly demarcated fields. The test of manufacture lies in the answer to the question whether what is processed or produced as the end-product is commercially known as a different product from the materials out of which it is so produced. Therefore, if the product has a different name and is identified by the buyers and sellers as a different product and is bought and sold as a distinct product from its raw materials, one can say that it is a manufactured product. There may be some room for debate as to whether this test is fully satisfied by edibles that come as end-products from the raw materials out of which they are made. But the expression ‘produce’ has to be taken in a more liberal sense than manufacture. If the end-product is different, that by itself would suffice to meet the requirement of ‘producing’. Hence, an exclusive catering unit of a hotel supplying eatables in bulk for consumption by air passengers will be eligible for relief - CIT v. East India Hotels Ltd. [1994] 209 ITR 854 (Cal.).
Provision must be construed liberally - A provision in the taxing statute granting incentives for promoting growth and development should be construed liberally. Since a provision intended for promoting economic growth has to be interpreted liberally, the restriction on it too has to be construed so as to advance the objective of the provision and not to frustrate it - Bajaj Tempo Ltd. v. CIT [1992] 62 Taxman 480 (SC).
CONSIDERING WHETHER YOU MEET OTHER ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA , YOU HAVE TO TAKE A DECISION ON THE BASIS OF ABOVE CASES
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Is this income indian or foreign income?
- GST on export of services and Input Credit
- RCM applicability on Rent Paid by Registered Person to Unregistered Landlord for Residental Building
- ITC temporary reversal and reclaim
- Applicable TDS rate for sale of property in Nov 2024
- Inventory of finished goods
- Can we claim ITC of Feb-2024 in the month of November-2024 which was not claimed by oversight
- REGARDING 25 AS DATE OF PAYMENT AND DATE OF BOOKING
- GST ON EXPORT COMMISSION
- Should I report my US salary for January, February, March in Schedule FA?
- Sale of property furniture sale
- Confusion around Form 26QB fields
- Adjustment entry in the case of Individual and HUF on 31st March
- Stock difference tax applicable on composite rate or normal rate
- LAST YEAR 2022-23 ITC IN NEXT YEAR 2023-24 REPORITNG IN GSTR-9
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- IGST Credit-Show cause notice issued-confusion
- Issue of gst e invoice
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
