Contingent liability and unjust enrichment
This query is : Resolved
19 May 2013
we have lost a case in CESTAT and not the case is pending before high court. Now our auditors are saying the we should not show this under contingent but should make provision in the books of accounts because we have lost the case in CESTAT. Now, if we provide this in the books, whether later on our claim can be rejected by invoking unjust enrichment clause or not. Please clarify.
20 May 2013
Not likely as the accounting is based on conservative norms. The notes to accounts can clarify the provision.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Is this income indian or foreign income?
- ITC temporary reversal and reclaim
- GST on export of services and Input Credit
- RCM applicability on Rent Paid by Registered Person to Unregistered Landlord for Residental Building
- Inventory of finished goods
- Applicable TDS rate for sale of property in Nov 2024
- Tds on building rent monthly
- GST ON EXPORT COMMISSION
- Should I report my US salary for January, February, March in Schedule FA?
- RCM INVOICING FROM NOV-2024
- Sale of property furniture sale
- Confusion around Form 26QB fields
- Adjustment entry in the case of Individual and HUF on 31st March
- Stock difference tax applicable on composite rate or normal rate
- LAST YEAR 2022-23 ITC IN NEXT YEAR 2023-24 REPORITNG IN GSTR-9
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- IGST Credit-Show cause notice issued-confusion
- Issue of gst e invoice
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
