Easy Office
LCI Learning


Taxguy

My client has received an incentive for early completion of project under the works contract. The Incentive was announced in the contract when it was entered and now it has been determined. Whether there will VAT on this amount received. Accoring to me it should not be brought to tax under VAT. It is neither a sale of goods nor a service under service tax. It is laible only for income tax.
Is my understanding correct.


CA Shishir
25 April 2008 at 11:16

Case Law on HP - 24(b)

Sec 24(b):In case of co-owners, each co-owner is eligible to claim a dedcution of interest on housing loan to the extent of Rs. 150,000/- in case of self occupied property.

Do share any supporting case law for the above.

Also, do clarify whether restriction of interest to Rs. 150,000/- is inclusive of pre-construction interest also.



Peter,A.Matthai
25 April 2008 at 11:14

trading/investment in shares by NRI's

dear sirs,
pls illustrate the most advantages way of doing share business by NRI's- what I mean is to pay minimum tax - suppose the NRI is settled in the Gulf and interested in investment in Indian shares -


Pankaj Sharma
25 April 2008 at 11:14

challan for IT order

I have received an order from Asst. Comm.of Income Tax, Delhi for Rs.500 in which challan should i submit the same.
for the Financial year 2005-2006.


SSA JI

there is any regulation with respect to dressing code for an article in ca firm or its depend upon requirement of chartered accountants firm .


Mihir
25 April 2008 at 11:11

Capital gain

A was having a flat of 500 sq. ft. for last 10 years. The building was revedeveloped and he took extra 100 sq. Ft. by paying some consideration to builder. Now he sold that flat after one year of redevelopment.

In this case how the capital gain will be calculated? how to treat the extra 100 sq. ft. purchased? whether to treat it as new house purchase or else will be treated as cost of imrpovement?


khaleel
25 April 2008 at 11:01

help helppppp

hi sir r v rao can u give me the phone no of ca student help line . thank u sir plssssssssssss.


Guest
25 April 2008 at 10:55

CA placements?


Mahesh

Sir,
In one of the cases the A.O. has disallowed the depreciation on a motor cycle on the ground that the Motor Cycle was procured on 31/3 and was not registered in the name of assessee. He has also proposed penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on the addition so made. Is he justified in doing so? I have read somewhere that in such a case the penalty should not be imposed. Please provide me the details of any related case or the provisions.
This is urgent.

Thanks in advance.
Mahesh