Market to market loss on the balance sheet date allowable
This query is : Resolved
14 May 2009
I made a sale of $10,000/- on 25th march 2009 where the rate was Rs.49
therefore entry passed
debtors a/c db 4,90,000
to sales a/c 4,90,000
now i have not received the money as on 31.03.2009 therefore i restate the debtors to the rate as on 31.03.2009 where the rate was Rs.45
foreign exchange loss a/c db 40,000
to debtors a/c 40,000
IS THE FOREIGN EXCHANGE LOSS OF Rs.40,000 ALLOWABLE UNDER INCOME TAX ACT
support ur answer by necessary notification/circulars/judgement etc.
therefore entry passed
debtors a/c db 4,90,000
to sales a/c 4,90,000
now i have not received the money as on 31.03.2009 therefore i restate the debtors to the rate as on 31.03.2009 where the rate was Rs.45
foreign exchange loss a/c db 40,000
to debtors a/c 40,000
IS THE FOREIGN EXCHANGE LOSS OF Rs.40,000 ALLOWABLE UNDER INCOME TAX ACT
support ur answer by necessary notification/circulars/judgement etc.
14 May 2009
Yes this is allowed under income tax act. This don't need to be supported by the case law/circular/notification.
It is prudent account concept, you can claim that.
It is prudent account concept, you can claim that.
14 May 2009
Dear,
Under Income tax act any forign gain or loss on account of revenue transaction, either reliased or unrealised is taxable or allowable as the case may be. You can take support from Delhi ITAT decision in the case of ONGC and Maruti India. Since in this exaple the loss is due to ssle transcaion, sale being a revenue transactions, losses are fully allowable. For further clarification let me know.
Under Income tax act any forign gain or loss on account of revenue transaction, either reliased or unrealised is taxable or allowable as the case may be. You can take support from Delhi ITAT decision in the case of ONGC and Maruti India. Since in this exaple the loss is due to ssle transcaion, sale being a revenue transactions, losses are fully allowable. For further clarification let me know.
14 May 2009
In my opinion, since the loss is not actual, it is not allowable.
The relevant judgement is R.D tradelink V/s Mumbai ITAT.
The relevant judgement is R.D tradelink V/s Mumbai ITAT.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Is this income indian or foreign income?
- RCM applicability on Rent Paid by Registered Person to Unregistered Landlord for Residental Building
- GST on export of services and Input Credit
- ITC temporary reversal and reclaim
- Inventory of finished goods
- Applicable TDS rate for sale of property in Nov 2024
- Tds on building rent monthly
- GST ON EXPORT COMMISSION
- Can we claim ITC of Feb-2024 in the month of November-2024 which was not claimed by oversight
- REGARDING 25 AS DATE OF PAYMENT AND DATE OF BOOKING
- LAST YEAR 2022-23 ITC IN NEXT YEAR 2023-24 REPORITNG IN GSTR-9
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- IGST Credit-Show cause notice issued-confusion
- Issue of gst e invoice
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- Regarding einvoice taken on nil rated sales
- Strategical investment in Public listed company
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
