Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

It was held by the Apex Court proceedings against a director of the company in contraventions of provisions of FERA,1973 will be commenced based on the finding that the role of the said directors at the time when offence had committed. The director w

The CESTAT bench of Ahmedabad ("the Tribunal") in the case of Gujarat Power Corporation Ltd. v C.C.E. & ST(Service Tax Appeal No. 10193 of 2017)dated November 18, 2022 held that payment of one-time premium under renting of immovable property services

The Telangana State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling ("TAAAR") in the case of M/s. Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board (Order in Appeal No. AAAR/12/2022) upheld the ruling passed by Advance Ruling Authority ("the AAR") of not

The Hon'ble Orissa High Court, ("the High Court") in Sri MunaPani v. State of Odisha (W.P.(C) No. 20996 of 2022) held that entertaining Writ Petition at the stage of notice would interrupt adjudication process and frustrate tax administration. Assess

The CESTAT, therefore, held that the CBEC was not given authority under Section 93 of the Finance Act, hence it is not permitted to provide exemptions or alter those already granted by the Central Government. As a result, the CBEC's circular cannot c

The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Abi Egg Traders v. Assistant Commissioner, Salem II Division, O/o The Assistant Commissioner of Goods and Services Tax Central Excise [W.P.No.3773 of 2020] ruled in favor of the assessee by directing the d

The Assessee also has the option of depositing this amount in Capital Gains Account Scheme as explained in Section 54 above, before the due date of furnishing the Income Tax Return.

In this case the refund to the assessee was due to order of CIT(A) and not the basis of regular assessment and hence interest under Section 234D is not leviable.

This appeal is against a judgment and order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT),whereby the learned Tribunal refused to stay the proceedings initiated by the Respondent, Axis Bank Limited against the Appellant for initiation

On an overall analysis of the facts involved and the part played by the Petitioner No.2 in the affairs of the Company at the relevant time, we are not inclined to interfere with the orders of the High Court or the Company Law Board, since we are not