Bail granted to Chartered Accountant not being a beneficiary of illegal availment of ITC


Quick Summary
The Punjab & Haryana High Court has granted bail to a Chartered Accountant arrested for allegedly facilitating fictitious statements and forged invoices related to Input Tax Credit (ITC). The court noted that the accountant had been in judicial custody since October 2021 and that prolonged incarceration would unduly restrict personal liberty. Crucially, there was no tangible evidence that the accountant personally benefited from the illegal ITC.

Court :
Punjab & Haryana High Court

Brief :
The Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the matter of M/sYogender Yadav v Union of India [CRM-M-53014 OF 2021 dated February 15, 2022] granted relief to a Chartered Accountant and held that judicial incarceration may not be prolonged, as it would unnecessarily curtail and fetter personal liberty of the Petitioner.

Citation :
CRM-M-53014 OF 2021 dated February 15, 2022

The Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the matter of M/sYogender Yadav v Union of India [CRM-M-53014 OF 2021 dated February 15, 2022] granted relief to a Chartered Accountant and held that judicial incarceration may not be prolonged, as it would unnecessarily curtail and fetter personal liberty of the Petitioner.

Facts:

M/s Yogender Yadav ("the Petitioner") has been alleged to commit an offence under Section 132(1)(b)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("the CGST Act") while he was serving as a Chartered Accountant with two proprietorship concerns and became arrested on October 23, 2021. The Petitioner is alleged by the Union of India ("the Prosecution") to facilitates fictitious statements of accounts and forged invoices of his two entities, to purportedly illegally avail the benefit , as embodied in Section 16 of the CGST Act.

The Court is of the opinion that the allegation as ascribed by the Prosecution to the Petitioner cannot be tested at this stage and only after the collection of evidence against the Petitioner, it can be concluded by the Inspector concerned to determine the validity of the Petitioner's incrimination. Moreover, there is no tangible evidence of his being a beneficiary of the illegal availment of the Input Tax Credit ("ITC").

Issue:

  • Whether the Petitioner is alleged to facilitates statement of accounts and forged invoices in order to illegally avail the benefit of ITC as embodied under Section 16 of the CGST Act?

Held:

The Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in[CRM-M-53014 OF 2021 datedFebruary 15, 2022] held as under:

  • The Petitioner is suffering judicial incarceration since his arrest, as made on October 23,2021. Therefore, his further judicial incarceration may not be prolonged, as it would unnecessarily curtail and fetter his personal liberty.
  • Held that, the Petitioner is ordered to be released from judicial custody in order to fleeing him from injustice and also asked to make his personal appearance when directed unless validly exempted.

FAQ :

The Chartered Accountant was accused of facilitating fictitious statements of accounts and forged invoices for two proprietorship concerns, allegedly to illegally avail Input Tax Credit (ITC).

The Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court made the decision regarding bail.

The Chartered Accountant was arrested on October 23, 2021.

Bail was granted because the Chartered Accountant had been in judicial custody for a significant period, and further incarceration was deemed to unnecessarily curtail personal liberty. There was also no tangible evidence of the accountant being a beneficiary of the illegal ITC.

The court opined that the allegations could not be conclusively tested at that stage and that evidence needed to be collected to determine the validity of the incrimination.

 

Bimal Jain
Published in GST
Views : 712

Comments




CCI Pro