Government's Clarification on the Reports that Finance Ministry Pays interest on Excess Tax Refund



This is with reference to the news report appearing in certain section of media that the Finance Ministry pays Rs.37, 365 cr. in interest on excess tax refund and similar reports. The emphasis of these reports is that huge interest was paid by the Government on refund of excess taxes during 2006-2007 to 2010-2011 and that as per the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) Report of January 31, 2014; such interest is without the authorisation of Parliament.

In this regard, it is stated that these news reports have not taken into consideration the fact that the rate of interest and entitlement to interest on excess taxes are determined by the statutory provisions of the Income Tax Act, enacted by the Parliament. Interest payment is a statutory obligation and non-discretionary in nature, which during 2006-2007 to 2010-2011 constituted 14.5% of refund. Such interest payment aggregated to Rs.21263 crore during 2001-2002 to 2005-2006, constituting 20.79% of refunds.

Government of India has been of the view that non reflection of interest on refund separately as expenditure in the Annual financial statement laid before both the houses of the Parliament did not violate any constitutional provision. It may also be clarified that the practice of not seeking specific appropriation for interest on refund as expenditure and treating it as reduction from gross tax revenue, has been consistently followed since the Income Tax Act came into force in 1961, with an exception in Budget Estimate (BE) for F.Y. 2001-2002, where estimated interest was separately shown as expenditure. However, in the Revised Estimate (RE)for the same year (as presented in the Budget for F.Y 2002-2003), the interest was reduced to nil. No Budget Estimate (BE) for such interest was given in the Budgets for F.Y 2002-2003 onwards. The learned Attorney General for India in his opinion dated 6.5.2013 also affirmed that refund on excess tax is not an expenditure under Article 112(1) of the Constitution and such outgo cannot be considered with other operational expenses.

The Report of PAC dated 31.1.2014 was laid in Parliament on 6.2.2014 and the recommendations and observations of the Committee will receive due consideration and responded to within 6 months of the presentation, as per the requirement of the Committee.




News posted by

Finance news reporter covering taxation, GST, income tax, business compliance, and economy updates. I simplify complex financial topics into easy-to-understand articles for professionals, taxpayers, and business owners on leading finance and tax platforms.

Comments :


More »

Popular News





CCI Pro



Company
ARTICLESHIP 20 October 2026
CA ARTICLE

AMKN & CO

Noida

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 27 October 2026
semi-qualified CA

Saini Pati Shah & Co LLP, Chartered Accountants

Mumbai

CA Final

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 October 2026
Article Trainee/ CMA Trainee

RMA And Associates LLP

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
06 October 2026
Assistant Manager - Audit and Compliance

Ravi K Jain & Co

Noida

Others

View Details
Company
14 October 2026
GST & TDS ASSISTANT

AGGARWAL SANJAY & ASSOCIATES

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 22 October 2026
Articleship intern

Srinath Manikanta

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 23 October 2026
Articled Trainee

J Y & CO

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
12 October 2026
Finance

I-Genext Consulting Private Limited

New Delhi

CA

View Details