Vinod Kumar Jain, Delhi ITO, Ward-47(3), New Delhi
Last updated: 24 December 2020
Court :
ITAT New Delhi
Brief :
This appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-16, New Delhi, Dated 29.04.2019, for the A.Y. 2015-2016.
Citation :
ITA.No.5948/Del./2019
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCHES “SMC-1” : DELHI
BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
AND
SHRI B.R.R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA.No.5948/Del./2019
Assessment Year 2015-2016
Shri Vinod Kumar Jain,
Prop. Vinod Kumar Mahesh
Kumar, 160, Kucha Ghasi
Ram, Fatehpuri, Chandani
Chowk, Delhi – 110 006
PAN ADHPJ5937B
(Appellant)
[vs.
The Income Tax Officer,
Ward – 47 (3),
New Delhi.
(Respondent)
For Assessee : -None- Application of
Withdrawal filed.
For Revenue : Mr. Shri Prakash Dubey , Sr.DR
Date of Hearing : 21.12.2020
Date of Pronouncement : 21.12.2020
ORDER
PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M.
This appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-16, New Delhi, Dated 29.04.2019, for the A.Y. 2015-2016.
2. We have heard the Learned Representatives of both the parties through video conferencing and perused the material available on record.
3. Learned Counsel for the Assessee has filed letter stating therein that assessee has opted for VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020 and filed Form Nos.1 and 2. He has, therefore, submitted that appeal of assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn.
To know more in details find the attachment file
Guest
Published in Income Tax
Views : 58
downloaded 70 times
Trending Online Classes
-
Excel Mastery Program
CA Rishabh Pugalia
CAclubindia
