Court :
Allahabad High Court
Brief :
The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of M/s. Vivo Mobile India Private v. Union of India and Others [Writ Tax No. 433 of 2021 dated September 5, 2023] allowed the writ petition and held that as per Rule 36(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 ("the CGST Rules"), the time period of February 2020 to August, 2020 would be considered cumulatively for calculating the amount of eligible Input Tax Credit ("ITC") for the invoices or debit notes, details of which has not been furnished, prescribing a limit of 10 per cent of the eligible ITC, pertaining to invoices or debit notes furnished by the supplier.
Citation :
Writ Tax No. 433 of 2021 dated September 5, 2023
The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of M/s. Vivo Mobile India Private v. Union of India and Others [Writ Tax No. 433 of 2021 dated September 5, 2023] allowed the writ petition and held that as per Rule 36(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 ("the CGST Rules"), the time period of February 2020 to August, 2020 would be considered cumulatively for calculating the amount of eligible Input Tax Credit ("ITC") for the invoices or debit notes, details of which has not been furnished, prescribing a limit of 10 per cent of the eligible ITC, pertaining to invoices or debit notes furnished by the supplier.
M/s. Vivo India Private Limited ("the Petitioner") is engaged in the business of manufacturing, assembly and wholesale trade in cellular phone devices, spare parts and accessories and has a manufacturing facility at Greater Noida, Gautam Buddh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh.
From February, 2020 to August, 2020, the Petitioner purchased various components of mobile phone and other related items from different suppliers within the country. The demand was raised by the Revenue Department ("the Respondent") claiming that the Petitioner had availed/utilized excess ITCof Rs.110,06,90,100.31/- for the month of February, 2020 to August, 2020. The Respondent vide order dated April 7, 2021 ("the Impugned Order") confirmed the demand raised, and held that excess ITC of Rs.110,06,90,100.31/- for the month of February, 2020 to August, 2020 was availed by the Petitioner in violation of Rule 36(4) of the CGST Rules., thereby directed the Petitioner to reverse the ITC claimed and added the amount of ITC claimed, towards Output Tax liability along with interest. The Respondent also imposed a penalty, equal to the amount of excess ITC claimed by the Petitioner under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("the CGST Act"). The Respondent created a Demand of a total amount of Rs.235.52 crores which is inclusive of interest of Rs.15,40,00,000/-.
Aggrieved by the Impugned Order and the demand raised by the Respondent, the Petitioner filed a writ petition before the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court for quashing the Impugned Order and pre-deposited the amount of Rs.11,00,69,010/- being ten per cent of the disputed demand of GST and disputed the entire tax liability.
However, the Respondent recovered the entire amount of Rs.220,13,80,200.69/- of the entire tax liability from the Petitioner. The Petitioner filed the writ petition on the ground that the error in the computation of the excess ITC has arisen due to relying upon Circular No. 123/42/219-GST dated November 11, 2019("the Impugned Circular"). However, certain provisions of the Impugned Circular being contrary to Notification No. 30/2020 dated April 3, 2020 ("the Notification"), and other related Notifications, could not be enforced for determining the amount of eligible ITC claimed.
The Petitioner also filed a Civil Miscellaneous Restitution Application No. 10 of 2022 praying for a refund of the entire amount deposited with the Respondent i.e. Rs.220,13,80,200.69/- and amount of Rs.11,00,69,010/- pre-deposited with the Respondent.
The Petitioner has also claimed interest on the amount deposited with the Respondent.
Whether the time period for the months of February, 2020 to August, 2020 would be considered cumulatively for calculating the amount of Eligible ITC for the invoices or debit notes, details of which have not been furnished by supplier in GSTR 1?
The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Writ Tax No. 433 of 2021held as under:
"(4) No input tax credit shall be availed by a registered person in respect of invoices or debit notes the details of which are required to be furnished under sub-section (1) of section 37 unless,-
(a) the details of such invoices or debit notes have been furnished by the supplier in the statement of outward supplies in FORM GSTR-1 or using the invoice furnishing facility; and
(b) the details of input tax credit in respect of such invoices or debit notes have been communicated to the registered person in FORM GSTR-2B under sub-rule (7) of rule 60.
Provided that the said condition shall apply cumulatively for the period February, March, April, May, June, July and August, 2020 and the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the tax period September, 2020 shall be furnished with the cumulative adjustment of input tax credit for the said months in accordance with the condition above."