Court :
ITAT New Delhi
Brief :
Since common questions of facts and law have been raisedin both the aforesaid appeals, the same are being disposed off by way of consolidated order to avoid repetition of discussion.
Citation :
ITA No.2374/Del./2018
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
(DELHI BENCH ‘I-1’ : NEW DELHI)
BEFORE SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
and
SHRI KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER
(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE)
ITA No.2374/Del./2018
(ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2012-13)
ITA No.2375/Del./2018
(ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2013-14)
M/s. Boeing India Pvt. Ltd.,
(APPELLANT)
vs.
ACIT,
(erstwhile known as Boeing International Circle 5 (1),
Corp. India Pvt. Ltd.), New Delhi.
3rd Floor, DLF Centre, Sansad Marg,
New Delhi – 110 001.
(PAN : AAHCB1218P)
(RESPONDENT)
ASSESSEE BY : Shri Arvind Datar, Sr. Advocate
Shri Sachit Jolly, Advocate
Ms. Anuradha Dutt, Advocate
Shri Tushar Jarwal, Advocate
REVENUE BY : Shri Surender Pal, CIT DR
Date of Hearing : 05.11.2020
Date of Order : 27.11.2020
O R D E R
PER KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER :
Since common questions of facts and law have been raisedin both the aforesaid appeals, the same are being disposed off by way of consolidated order to avoid repetition of discussion.
2. Appellant, M/s. Boeing India Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as ‘the taxpayer’) by filing the present appeal sought to set aside the impugned order both dated 26.12.2017 passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-44, New Delhi in theappeals challenging the orders passed by the ld. TPO/AssessingOfficer qua the assessment years 2012-13 & 2013-14 on the identical grounds, except the difference in amount, inter alia that :-
To know more in details find the attachment file
Excel Mastery Program