Court :
AAR, Kerala
Brief :
The AAR, Kerala, in the matter of M/s Choice Foundation [Advance Ruling No. KER/10/2023 dated March 10, 2023] ruled that supply of services to assessee to its own joint venture would attract GST as per Notification No. 11/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated June 28, 2017 (“the Service Rate Notification”) since, the assessee and the joint venture are 2 different ‘person’ for the taxation laws.
Citation :
Advance Ruling No. KER/10/2023 dated March 10, 2023
The AAR, Kerala, in the matter of M/s Choice Foundation [Advance Ruling No. KER/10/2023 dated March 10, 2023] ruled that supply of services to assessee to its own joint venture would attract GST as per Notification No. 11/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated June 28, 2017 (“the Service Rate Notification”) since, the assessee and the joint venture are 2 different ‘person’ for the taxation laws.
M/s Choice Foundation ("the Applicant") is a charitable society possessing experience in operating educational institutions in the state of Kerala. The Applicant proposes to enter into a joint venture agreement with M/s Choice Estates and Constructions Pvt. Ltd. ("CECPL") to jointly operate an educational institution from the property owned by CECPL.
As per the joint venture agreement, the revenue generated from the operation of the educational institution will be shared between the Applicant and CECPL in a fixed ratio which would be decided subsequently.
The Applicant filed an application before the AAR, Kerala, seeking the clarification regarding the taxability of revenue generated from educational institution in the hands of assessee.
Whether the Applicant’s share in revenue generated by collecting fees from students of educational institute would attracts GST?
The AAR, Kerala, in Advance Ruling No. KER/10/2023 ruledas under:
In the present case, since the Applicant entered into an agreement to share the risk/revenue/profit/loss/liability making the Applicant owner of the educational institution. The services rendered by the owner to the business entity is not equivalent to the services rendered by the third party since, the share in profit hold by owner is in the nature of actionable claim which is neither supply of goods nor supply of service. Thus, the share of profit received by the Applicant should not attract GST.
PF & ESI Course - Labour Code 2019 Along with Examples and Case Studies