Subhash Kumar Goyal, Delhi ITO, Ward- 61(5), New Delhi

Last updated: 24 December 2020

Court :
ITAT New Delhi

Brief :
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT (Appeals)-20, New Delhi for Assessment Year 2014-15.

Citation :
ITA. No. 1891/Del/2018

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCH “G”: NEW DELHI

BEFORE SHRI H. S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER
A N D
SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
(Through Video Conferencing)
ITA. No. 1891/Del/2018
(Assessment Year: 2014-15)

Subhash Kumar Goyal,
C/o. Kapil Goel, Adv.,
F–26/124, Sector –7, Rohini,
Delhi – 110 085.
PAN: AARPG1386Q
(Appellant)

Vs.

ITO,
Ward : 61 (5)
New Delhi
(Respondent)

Assessee by : N o n e;
Revenue by: Shri H.K. Choudhary [CIT]–DR;

Date of Hearing 21/12/2020
Date of pronouncement 21 /12/2020

O R D E R

PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, A. M.

1. This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT (Appeals)-20, New Delhi for Assessment Year 2014-15.

2. The assessee submitted a letter dated 14.12.2020 that assessee has already filed Form No. 1 on 23.11.2020 under Vivad se Vishwas Scheme in accordance with Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 and, therefore, the appeal of the assessee may be treated as withdrawn.

3. The ld. DR also did not object and agreed with the contention of the assessee mentioned in the above letter.

4. In view of this we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn with a liberty to the assessee to file a Miscellaneous application for recall of this order in case Form No. 3 is not issued by the Revenue.

To know more in details find the attachment file