Recovery proceedings not to be initiated against the former director of the Company who was not the director during the concerned period
Last updated: 24 April 2024
Court :
Bombay High Court
Brief :
The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Prasanna Kumar Shetty v. State of Maharashtra and Others [Writ Petition No. 3098 of 2024 dated April 16, 2024] allowed the writ petition and set aside the attachment order in case where recovery proceedings were initiated against the former director of the Company who was not the director of the Company during the concerned period.
Citation :
Writ Petition No. 3098 of 2024 dated April 16, 2024
You have reached daily limit of 2 Free Judgements. To view this or other Judgements please subscribe to CCI PRO :
Stay updated! Stay ads free
Browse CAclubindia ads free.
Latest updates on WA.
Daily E-Newsletter and much more.
CCI PRO annual subscription :
Original Price : INR 1999/-
Offer Price : INR 999/-
Duration : 1 year
(Prices Inclusive of GST)
Know More
Note: If you are a PRO member already, please click here to login (for ad free experience)
Bimal Jain
Published in GST
Views : 112
downloaded 137 times
Trending Online Classes
-
Certification Course on GSTR-3B Reconciliation with GSTR-2B through Chat GPT
CA Deepak Gupta26 April 2025
CAclubindia
