Court :
CESTAT, Chandigarh
Brief :
The CESTAT, Chandigarh in the case of M/s. Pearls Buildwell Infrastructure Limited v. Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Chandigarh - I [Service Tax Appeal No. 1196 of 2011 dated September 19, 2023] set aside the demand confirmed by the Commissioner for Service tax on the basis of calculation sheet only. The Tribunal found that the appellants did not collect any service tax from their customers, substantiated by the absence of invoices and a certificate from their customer confirming this. Consequently, the Commissioner's reliance on calculation sheets to establish service tax collection was considered insufficient. As a result, the impugned order was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed. Simultaneously, the Department's appeal against the dropped demand was dismissed.
Citation :
Service Tax Appeal No. 1196 of 2011 dated September 19, 2023
The CESTAT, Chandigarh in the case of M/s. Pearls Buildwell Infrastructure Limited v. Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Chandigarh - I [Service Tax Appeal No. 1196 of 2011 dated September 19, 2023] set aside the demand confirmed by the Commissioner for Service tax on the basis of calculation sheet only. The Tribunal found that the appellants did not collect any service tax from their customers, substantiated by the absence of invoices and a certificate from their customer confirming this. Consequently, the Commissioner's reliance on calculation sheets to establish service tax collection was considered insufficient. As a result, the impugned order was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed. Simultaneously, the Department's appeal against the dropped demand was dismissed.
M/s Pearls Buildwell Infrastructure Limited ("the Appellant") is engaged in Construction Services related to road laying. An intelligence report indicated that the Appellants had collected service tax from their customers but had not deposited it with the exchequer. Consequently, a show-cause notice was issued on April 23, 2010, demanding service tax of Rs. 97,71,146.68/- along with interest. The notice also proposed penalties under Sections 76, 77 & 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 ("the Finance Act"). The Appellants had already deposited Rs. 10,20,994/- as Service Tax and Rs. 55,731/- as interest, which was sought to be adjusted.
The Commissioner, through the impugned order dated March 25, 2011, confirmed a demand of Rs. 10,24,928/- and the related interest but dropped the rest of the demand. The Appellants appealed against this confirmation, and the Department appealed against the dropped demand.
The Appellant further contented that the Commissioner's findings relied on calculation sheets discovered during a search, overlooking a certificate from the Appellant and its customers vide letters dated September 03, 2008 and October 06, 2008 confirmed that no service tax had been charged.
Whether the provisions of Section 73A of the Finance Act is applicable to the case?
The CESTAT, Chandigarh in Service Tax Appeal No. 1196 of 2011 held as under:
"Service Tax Collected from any person to be deposited with Central Government
(1) Any person who is liable to pay service tax under the provisions of this Chapter or the rules made thereunder, and has collected any amount in excess of the service tax assessed or determined and paid on any taxable service under the provisions of this Chapter or the rules made thereunder from the recipient of taxable service in any manner as representing service tax, shall forthwith pay the amount so collected to the credit of the Central Government.
(2) Where any person who has collected any amount, which is not required to be collected, from any other person, in any manner as representing service tax, such person shall forthwith pay the amount so collected to the credit of the Central Government.
(3) Where any amount is required to be paid to the credit of the Central Government under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) and the same has not been so paid, the Central Excise Officer shall serve, on the person liable to pay such amount, a notice requiring him to show cause why the said amount, as specified in the notice, should not be paid by him to the credit of the Central Government.
(4) The Central Excise Officer shall, after considering the representation, if any, made by the person on whom the notice is served under sub-section (3), determine the amount due from such person, not being in excess of the amount specified in the notice, and thereupon such person shall pay the amount so determined.
(5) The amount paid to the credit of the Central Government under sub-section (1) or sub- section (2) or sub-section (4), shall be adjusted against the service tax payable by the person on finalisation of assessment or any other proceeding for determination of service tax relating to the taxable service referred to in sub-section (1).
(6) Where any surplus amount is left after the adjustment under sub-section (5), such amount shall either be credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund referred to in section 12C of the Central Excise Act, 1944 or, as the case may be, refunded to the person who has borne the incidence of such amount, in accordance with the provisions of section 11B of the said Act and such person may make an application under that section in such cases within six months from the date of the public notice to be issued by the Central Excise Officer for the refund of such surplus amount."