Court :
ITAT Chennai
Brief :
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the learned CIT(Appeals)-8, Chennai dated 06.02.2019 and pertains to assessment year 2015-16.
Citation :
I.T.A.No.1018/Chny/2019
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ,
‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI
BEFORE SHRI V.DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER
AND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
I .T.A.No.1018/Chny/2019
Assessment Year : 2015-16)
M/s. Mint Properties Pvt.Ltd..,
122, Broadway,
Chennai -600 108.
PAN: AAACM 5348Q
Appellant
Vs
The Income Tax Officer,
Corporate Ward-4(1)
Chennai.
Respondent
Appellant by : Mr. M.Karunakaran, Advocate
Respondent by : Mr. G.Johnson, Addl.CIT
Date of hear ing : 17.12.2020
Date of Pronouncement : 31.12.2020
O R D E R
PER G. MANJUNATHA, AM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the learned CIT(Appeals)-8, Chennai dated 06.02.2019 and pertains to assessment year 2015-16.
2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:-
“1. The learned Commissioner of Income-tax Appeals) erred in confirming the disallowance of Rs.16,23,470/- made under section 14A of the Act.
2. The authorities below erred in taking the interest paid of Rs.10,76,939/- as attributable to investments in the firms, the share income from which is exempt from taxu/s 10(2A) of the Act for disallowance u/s 14A r/w Rule 8D(2)(ii).
3 The authorities below should have seen that the borrowals on which interest was paid were directly advanced to various parties for interest and such interest of Rs. 27,62,380/- was offered for tax as income.
4. The appellant submits that there is a direct nexus between the borrowals and advances/loans given and therefore the interest paid has to be adjusted against the interest received and offered for tax.
To know more in details find the attachment file
Excel Mastery Program