Court :
ITAT Mumbai
Brief :
The assessee has filed these two appeals againstthe separate orders of Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) - 4, Mumbai, passed u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Citation :
ITA 3118/MUM/2019
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
“A” BENCH, MUMBAI
BEFORE SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR, VICE PRESIDENT &
SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER
ITA Nos. 3118 & 3119/Mum/2019
(A.Ys: 2011-12 & 2010-11)
Anand Film &
Telecommunication P. Ltd.,
1101 Raheja Classique,
Building No. 3, New Link
Road, Andheri (W),
Mumbai – 400053
PAN/GIR No. : AADCA0599E
Appellant
Vs.
ACIT, Circle – 16(1)
Aayakar Bhavan, M.K
Road, Mumbai.
Respondent
Appellant by : Shri Ashok Mehta, AR
Respondent by : Shri Brajendra Kumar, DR
Date of Hearing 01/01/2021
Date of Pronouncement 01/01/2021
O R D E R
PER BENCH:
The assessee has filed these two appeals againstthe separate orders of Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) - 4, Mumbai, passed u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. At the time of hearing, the Ld. Counsel for theassessee submitted that there is a delay of 54 days in filing the appeals before the Hon’ble Tribunal andfiled the affidavit for condonation of delay. We foundthe facts mentioned in the affidavit are reasonable and accordingly condone the delay and admit the appeals. Contra, Ld. DR has no specific objection.
To know more in details find the atatchment file
Live class on PF & ESI Enrollment & Returns Filing(with recording)
CAclubindia
