Income Tax Refund cannot be adjusted in excess of 20% of Disputed Demand: Delhi HC


Last updated: 14 August 2021

Court :
Delhi High Court

Brief :
In Eko India Financial Services (P) Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax in W.P.(C) 5819/2021 dated August 03, 2021 the Hon'ble Delhi High Court directed the Revenue ('the Respondents') to refund the amount adjusted in excess of 20% of the disputed demand for the Assessment Year ('AY').

Citation :
W.P.(C) 5819/2021 dated August 03, 2021

In Eko India Financial Services (P) Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax in W.P.(C) 5819/2021 dated August 03, 2021 the Hon’ble Delhi High Court directed the Revenue ('the Respondents') to refund the amount adjusted in excess of 20% of the disputed demand for the Assessment Year ('AY').

Fact

Eko India Financial Services (P) Limited ('the Petitioner') is aggrieved as, the refund available to them in respect of the AY 2019 -20, was adjusted against the disputed demand AY 2017-18 in excess of 20%, which is contrary to the guidelines issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes ('CBDT') vide Office Memorandum dated August 25, 2017.

In reply, the Respondents refers to para 4(B) of the Office Memorandum dated February 29, 2016 which states that pre-deposit of 20% is not a rule of the thumb and the Respondent has the discretion to direct a set off of a higher sum.

Held

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in W.P.(C) 5819/2021 dated August 03, 2021 held as under:

  • If the Respondent is of the view that the payment of a lump sum amount higher than 20% is warranted, then the Respondent will have to give reasons for same in terms of para 4(B) of the Office Memorandum dated February 29, 2016.
  • The Respondents have not given any special/particular reason as to why any amount in excess of 20% of the outstanding demand should be recovered from the Petitioner.
  • Hence, the respondent is entitled to seek pre-deposit of only 20% of the disputed demand.
  • The Respondent is directed to refund the amount adjusted in excess of 20% of the disputed demand for the Assessment Year 2017-18.
 

Bimal Jain
Published in Income Tax
Views : 155

Comments




CCI Pro

Follow us
add to google news


Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
Taxation Content Writer Intern

Interactive Media Pvt Ltd.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 14 July 2026
Article Assistants

R Shyam and Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
16 July 2026
Manager - Finance & Accounts

Aliens Group

Hyderabad

CA Final

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
2 posts Article assistant and Articleship completed students

Chirag N Shah & Associates

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 10 July 2026
Article Assistant

N S Gokhale & Co

Thane

CA Inter

View Details
Company
22 July 2026
Senior Chartered Accountant

SKSS

Patna

CA

View Details
Company
Featured 18 July 2026
CA Articleship

apricus india

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 16 July 2026
Semi Qualified Company Secretary

Vakilsearch.com

Chennai

CS

View Details