Court :
ITAT Bangalore
Brief :
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the assessmentorder dated 23.12.2015 passed by the A.O. u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144C ofthe Income-tax Act,1961 ['the Act' for short] for assessment year2011-12 in pursuance of directions given by Ld. Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP).
Citation :
IT(TP)A No.314/Bang/2016
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
“C’’ BENCH: BANGALORE
BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND
SHRI B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IT(TP)A No.314/Bang/2016
Assessment Year: 2011-12
M/s. Meritor CVS India (P) Ltd.
Tower 1, IT Sector SEZ,
Mylasandra, Kengeri Hobli,
RVCE Post
Bangalore-560 059
PAN NO : AAFCM7571E
APPELLANT
Vs.
ITO Ward-4(1)(3)
Bangalore
RESPONDENT
Appellant by : Shri C. Ramesh, A.R.
Respondent by : Shri Pradeep Kumar, D.R.
Date of Hearing : 05.01.2021
Date of Pronouncement : 05.01.2021
O R D E R
PER B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the assessmentorder dated 23.12.2015 passed by the A.O. u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144C ofthe Income-tax Act,1961 ['the Act' for short] for assessment year2011-12 in pursuance of directions given by Ld. Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP).
2. At the time of hearing, the Ld A.R advanced his arguments onlyin respect of Ground No.2 relating to Transfer Pricing adjustmentmade by the AO/TPO. In this ground, the assessee has soughtexclusion of four comparable companies and inclusion of twocomparable companies. However, at the time of hearing, the Ld A.Rsubmitted that he is not pressing for exclusion of E-zest SolutionsLtd and also not pressing for inclusion of Thinksoft Global ServicesLtd. Accordingly, the grounds relating to above said two companiesare dismissed as not pressed. Consequently, the assessee is seeking exclusion of three comparable companies and inclusion of one comparable company. The details of the same are discussed in the later part of this order.
To know more in details find the atatchment file
Live class on PF & ESI Enrollment & Returns Filing(with recording)
CAclubindia
