Imposition of penalty under s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act


Last updated: 17 April 2021

Court :
ITAT Ahmedabad

Brief :
The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the Assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-1, Ahmedabad (?CIT(A)? in short), dated 07.08.2018 arising in the penalty order dated 30.06.2017 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) concerning AY 2007-08.

Citation :
ITA 2082/AHD/2018

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
 “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
(Convened through Virtual Court)

BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE PRESIDENT AND
SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER 

I.T.A. No. 2082/Ahd/2018 
Assessment Year : 2007-08)

M/s. Aagam Shares &
Commodities Pvt. Ltd.
607, Pipardi Ni Pole,
Hajapatels Pole, Relief
Road, Kalupur,
Ahmedabad - 380001 
PAN/GIR No. : AABCK4493P 
Appellant) 

Vs.

DCIT
Central Circle -1(1)(1),
Ahmedabad - 380015 
Respondent) 

Appellant by : Shri P. D. Shah, A.R. 
Respondent by : Shri S. S. Shukla, Sr.DR

Date of Hearing  04/03/2021 
Date of Pronouncement 26/03/2021 

O R D E R

PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA - AM:

The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the Assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-1, Ahmedabad (CIT(A) in short), dated 07.08.2018 arising in the penalty order dated 30.06.2017 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) concerning AY 2007-08.

2. The ground of appeal raised by assessee read hereunder:

“1. That the learned CIT(A) has erred in laws and facts by confirming the penalty of Rs.13,50,000/- u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Actand therefore the ld.AO should be directed to delete the said penalty of Rs.13,50,000/-.” 

3. Briefly stated, the assessee company earlier named KGMSFinancial Services Pvt. Ltd. is engaged in the business of dealingstock market and purchase and sale of shares. The assessee filedreturn of income for AY 2007-08 declaring total income of Rs.24,60,420/-. The return filed by the assessee was subjected toscrutiny assessment under s.143(3) of the Act wherein total incomewas determined at Rs.69,69,045/-. The AO inter alia made anaddition of Rs.45 Lakhs under s.68 of the Act on account of introduction of share capital at premium in the books of account and consequently imposed a penalty of Rs.13,50,000/- thereon. The quantum addition was sustained by the CIT(A) as well as the ITAT. The imposition of penalty of Rs.13,50,000/- was challenged before the CIT(A) without any success

To know more in details find the attachment file. 

 
Join CCI Pro



Comments

CAclubindia's WhatsApp Groups Link