GST Registration cancelled without granting any hearing and proper reasoning not sustainable


Quick Summary
The Delhi High Court has ruled that cancelling a GST registration without providing a proper hearing or clear reasoning is unlawful. In a case involving M/s. Att SYS India Pvt. Ltd. Estex Tele Pvt. Ltd. Consortium, the court found that the petitioner was not given an opportunity to contest the cancellation and the order lacked justification. Consequently, the court set aside the cancellation order and directed the restoration of the GST registration.

Court :
Delhi High Court

Brief :
The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of M/s. Att SYS India Pvt. Ltd. Estex Tele Pvt. Ltd. Consortium v. Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax [W.P. (C) 14494/2023 dated November 20, 2023] allowed the writ petition and directed the Revenue Department to restore Petitioner GST Registration thereby holding that, GST Registration cancelled without granting any hearing and proper reasoning is not sustainable.

Citation :
W.P. (C) 14494/2023 dated November 20, 2023

The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of M/s. Att SYS India Pvt. Ltd. Estex Tele Pvt. Ltd. Consortium v. Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax [W.P. (C) 14494/2023 dated November 20, 2023] allowed the writ petition and directed the Revenue Department to restore Petitioner GST Registration thereby holding that, GST Registration cancelled without granting any hearing and proper reasoning is not sustainable.

Facts

M/s. Att SYS India Pvt. Ltd. Estex Tele Pvt. Ltd. Consortium ("the Petitioner") is an Association of Person, constituted by ATT SYS India Pvt. Ltd. and Estex Tele Private Limited to execute the contract awarded by Indian Highway Management Company Limited ("the Company") for conducting traffic surveys on National Highway. The Petitioner was registered under the GST Act in the year 2017.

The Contract awarded in favour of the Petitioner was terminated by the Company. Thereafter, the Company referred the dispute to the Arbitration wherein the Arbitral Tribunal directed the Company to make the payment to the Petitioner. The Petitioner was not engaged in other business, thus was filing Nil returns. 

The Petitioner, after receiving the amount stated in the award, was required to discharge GST liability. The Petitioner after examining the portal found that the Petitioner's GST registration was cancelled vide order dated December 26, 2020 ("the Impugned Order") by the Revenue Department ("the Respondent") and therefore, the Petitioner is unable to file GST Returns. The Petitioner has also paid GST in excess of Rs. 14.90 Lakhs. 

Issue

Whether GST Registration cancelled without granting any hearing and proper reasoning is sustainable?

Held

The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of W.P. (C) 14494/2023 held as under:

  • Noted that, nowhere the date and time of personal hearing was mentioned the copy of Show Cause Notice ("the SCN"). Therefore, the Petitioner was not afforded an opportunity of hearing to contest the SCN. 
  • Further Noted that, the Impugned Order is not informed by reason and does not set any ground for cancellation of the Petitioner GST registration. 
  • Opined that, the Impugned Order cancelling the GST Registration is void and has been passed in violation of principles of Natural Justice. 
  • Held that, the Impugned Order is not sustainable and set aside. Hence, the Writ Petition is allowed. 
  • Directed that, the Petitioner GST Registration be restored by the Respondent. The Court also, directed the Petitioner to comply with statutory provisions by filing the returns in accordance with law. 

FAQ :

The Delhi High Court ruled that cancelling a GST registration without affording the taxpayer a hearing and without providing proper reasoning is not sustainable and is void.

The case was M/s. Att SYS India Pvt. Ltd. Estex Tele Pvt. Ltd. Consortium v. Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax.

The article implies the cancellation was due to the petitioner filing nil returns after a contract dispute and subsequent arbitration award, but the cancellation order itself lacked specific grounds and a proper hearing was not granted.

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the cancellation order, and directed the Revenue Department to restore the petitioner's GST registration.

The cancellation order was deemed to be in violation of the principles of Natural Justice because the petitioner was not given an opportunity for a personal hearing and the order lacked valid reasoning.

 



Judgement posted by

Service

FCA, FCS LLB with21 Yrs of Experience inTaxation Indirect and Direct: Education Qualification: B.Com (Hons) Chartered Accountants Company Secretary LLB Qualified SAP FI/CO Consultants Professional Membership: Chairmanof Indirect Tax Committee of PHD Chamber of Commerce Member of Indirec ... Read more

Comments




CCI Pro



Company
10 October 2026
Accounts Associate Level 1

Abic and Mani Chartered Accountants

Kottayam

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 29 October 2026
Article Assistant (CA Inter / CMA Inter) - Thrissur

Varma Raja & Associates

Thrissur

CA Inter

View Details
Company
14 October 2026
Accountant

Rize.farm

Bengaluru

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 27 October 2026
semi-qualified CA

Saini Pati Shah & Co LLP, Chartered Accountants

Mumbai

CA Final

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 October 2026
Article Assistant

Malhotra Rajesh & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
14 October 2026
Asst. Manager/Dy Manager (Costing)

manufacturing

Pune

CMA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 22 October 2026
Articleship intern

Srinath Manikanta

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
31 October 2026
Accountants

sankaran and krishnan

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details