Court :
ITAT Chennai
Brief :
This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against order of the learned CIT(A)-18, Chennai dated 18.09.2017 and pertains to assessment year 2011-12.
Citation :
I.T.A.No.3069/Chny/2017
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI
BEFORE SHRI V.DURGA RAO , JUDICIAL MEMBER
AND SHRI G.MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
I.T.A.No.3069/Chny/2017
Assessment Year : 2011-12
The Deputy Commissioner of Income
Tax,
Central Circle-1(1)
Chennai.
Appellant
vs
M/s. TCP Ltd.
10, TCP SapthagiriBhavan
Karpagambal Nagar,
Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.
PAN: AAACT 3615K
Respondent
Appellant by : Ms. R.Anita, JCIT
Respondent by : Mrs. S.Vidya, C.A
Date of hearing : 22.07.2021
Date of Pronouncement : 28.07.2021
O R D E R
This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against order of the learned CIT(A)-18, Chennai dated 18.09.2017 and pertains to assessment year 2011-12.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee company is in the business of manufacturing and trading of chemicals and generation of power has filed its return of income for assessment year 2011-12 on 30.09.2011.
3.Being aggrieved by assessment order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the learned CIT(A). Before the
learned CIT(A), the assessee has challenged disallowances u/s.14A of the Act on the ground that the Assessing Officer has erred in disallowing of interest expenditure, even though the assessee has filed necessary evidence to prove that it has not used interest bearing funds for making investments in shares and securities which yield exempt income.
4. The first issue that came up for our consideration from ground no.2 of revenue appeal is disallowance of expenditure in relation to exempt income u/s.14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The facts with regard to impugned dispute are that the assessee has earned dividend income of Rs.6,99,349/-, which was claimed exempt u/s.10(34) of the Act. The assessee had also disallowed a sum of Rs.60,073/- as expenditure incurred towards earning exempt income.
5.In the result, appeal filed by Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 28th July, 2021.
Please find attached the enclosed file for the full judgement