Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The Gujarat Authority of Advance Ruling (AAR) ruled that product namely J.J.'s Popcorn of M/s Jay Jalaram Enterprises manufactured from raw corn/maize grains, by heating turn into puffed corns/popcorns. Further other ingredients like salt and turmeri

AAR Authority made it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to any dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also me

The Appellate Authority of Advance Ruling (AAAR), West Bengal ruled that fusible interlining cloth is not a woven fabric and falls under HSN 5903, so 12% Goods and Service Tax (GST) is applicable.

he position in law is well-settled. After 1.4.1989, it is not necessary for the assessee to establish that the debt, in fact, has become irrecoverable. It is enough if the bad debt is written off as irrecoverable in the accounts of the assessee. When

Authority for Advanced Ruling Karnataka held that the incomes received from salary/remuneration as a Non-executive Director of a private limited company, renting of commercial property and renting of residential property and the values of amounts ext

The AAR, Tamil Nadu in the matter of VBC Associates [Advance Ruling No. 10/2022/ARA dated August 31, 2022], has ruled that the assessee is not eligible to claim Input Tax Credit ("ITC"), as per Section 17(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act,

Since interest subsidies and power subsidies are provided by the government to the entities establishing units in specified areas are of Capital nature. The subsidies are given to develop the specified areas and generate employment. Since these subsi

When the amount is credited to suspense account or any account, by whatever name called, then it is treated as amount credited to the account of the payee and tax has to be deducted at source. Hence, tax has to be deducted at source even on provision

The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the matter of PitchaiahVenkateshprumal v. Superintendent of CGST & Central Excise [W.P(MD). No. 25743 of 2022 & W.M.P(MD) Nos. 19848 & 19850 of 2022 dated November 14, 2022]has held that cancellation of Goods and Serv

The Hon'ble Chhattisgarh High Court in the matter of M/s CG Associates v. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors. [Writ Petition (T) No. 288 of 2022 dated January 5, 2023] has directed the Water Resources Department to take into consideration the Representation