Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The Hon'ble Calcutta High Court, in the case of J. L. Enterprises v. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax [W.P.A. No. 12132 of 2023 dated May 25, 2023] held that cash-credit facility is not a debt, thus cannot be attached through provisional attachment

The CESTAT, Delhi in M/s. B.L. Kashyap & Sons Ltd. v. Commissioner of Service Tax [Service Tax Appeal No. 54315 of 2014 dated May 30, 2013], while quashing the impugned order, set aside the liability, and held that the appellant is eligible to adjust

The CESTAT, Chennai in the case of M/s. Bharat Cylinders v. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise [Service Tax Appeal No. 40090 of 2014 dated June 01, 2023] held that if refund overlaps with the period for which the demand has been confirm, the assess

The CESTAT, Chennai in the case of M/s. Same Deutz – Fahr India (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise(Customs Appeal No.42175 of 2014, dated May 26, 2023) allowed the Export Oriented Unit (“EOU") and financing company jointly to enjoy the

The AAR, Uttarakhand, in the case of M/s. Uttarakhand Public Financial Strengthening Project [Ruling No. 15/2022-23 dated March 27, 2023], ruled that the service provider has to charge GST on the whole amount of the bill including i.e. monthly rental

The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Tvl. Sri Maharaja Industries v. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) [W.P Nos. 16075, 16077, 16080 and 16082 of 2023 and W.M.P.Nos.15499, 15500, 15501, 15502, 15506, 15508, 15509 & 15511 of 2023, dated Ma

The ITAT, Pune in M/s. Pushpak Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT, Circle-10, Pune [ITA No. 301/PUN/2023 dated on May, 16, 2023] allowed the depreciation or other expenses on maintenance of the vehicles used by the director employees by treating it b

The CESTAT, Chennai in M/s. T.A.F.E Access Ltd. v. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise [Service Tax Appeal No. 526 of 2012 dated May 26, 2023] set aside the order demanding Service Tax on cost of the spares/materials used for providing the free serv

The ITAT, Ahmedabad in the matter of the DCIT, Central Circle-1(1), Ahmedabad v. NBM Iron & Steel Trading Pvt. Ltd. [ITA No. 205/Ahd/2022, dated May 17, 2023]held that if an assessee during a survey surrendered his income and later showed that income

The AAAR, Uttar Pradesh in the case of M/s the Indian Hume Pipes Company Ltd. (Appeal Order No. 05/AAAR dated March 10, 2023) has held that, the assessee providing works contract services to Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam (“UP Jal Nigam”), a government auth