Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The AAR, Telangana in the matter of M/s. Vodafone Idea Limited [TSAAR Order No. 36/2022 dated July 11, 2022] ruled that the supply of telecommunication services to a local authority is a taxable service under Section 9(1) of the Central Goods and Ser

The AAR, West Bengal in the matter of M/s West Bengal Agro Industries Corporation Limited [Advance Ruling No. WBAAR 15 of 2022 dated December 22, 2022] has ruled that assessee acting as Project Implementing Agency, making supplies to the State Govern

The AAR, West Bengal in the matter of Banchu Das [Advance Ruling No. WBAAR 23 of 2022 dated October 21, 2022] has ruled that, the supply of services to the Government or Government authority for annual operation and maintenance of capacity portable c

The AAAR, Andhra Pradesh in the matter of M/s Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Limited [Order No. AAAR/AP/07(GST)/2022 dated December 19, 2022] upheld the order of the AAR wherein it was held that the administration of COVID - 19 vaccine is not

The Hon'ble Jharkhand High Court in M/s Vinayak Metal and Chemicals& Ors. v. the State of Jharkhand & Ors. [W.P.(T) No. 3022 of 2020 dated November 14, 2022] quashed and set aside the orders blocking Electronic Credit Ledger ("ECL") of the assessee w

The Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in Sri Karibasappa v. Sri Mallikarjun [Criminal Appeal No. 200106/2020, dated December 16, 2022] set aside the acquittal order passed by the Trial Court and sentenced the accused to pay a fine of INR 2,00,000/- or to

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Hewlett Packard India Sales Pvt. Ltd. &Anr. v. Commissioner of Customs (Import), Nhava Sheva [Civil Appeal No. 5373 and 6715 of 2019, dated January 17, 2023] set aside the orders of CESTAT, Mumbai, which classified the In

The CESTAT, New Delhi in the matter of M/s Classic Interiors v. Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi [Customs Appeal No. 51454 of 2022 dated January 12, 2023] modified the order of the Commissioner of Customs(Appeals), to the extent that the amount of

High Court had justly affirmed the view taken by the first appellate authority, holding that the Respondent/Assessee-Company qualified for the deduction under Section 80-IA being an enterprise carrying on the stated business pertaining to infrastruct

The present case falls Clause (vi) of Exceptions mentioned in the insurance policy i.e."(vi) Any damage if the temperature in the Refrigeration chambers does not exceed 4.4degree Celsius." Since the Report of the Surveyor shown discrepancies in the m