Held by the Hon`ble Court that, it is not necessary to establish that debt had become bad only to write it off as irrecoverable in its accounts is enough to claim deduction u/s 36(1)(vii).
Held by the Hon`ble Court that, any `forced illness` of the machinery cannot disentitle to the assessee to claim the depreciation allowance, form the director report it is clear that the assessee was prevented form using the machinery because of the
Held by the Hon`ble Court that, it is well settled law that while disposing of an appeal , the authority must record reason of its decision. Therefore it is not justified in law to dispose of an appeal without recoding any reason.
The assessee was a registered merchant exporter. On receipt of orders directly from abroad it purchased goods from various parties including some purchases made from EOU units. These units were entitled to deduction under s.10B. The benefits only und
The assessee was manufacturing and trading in consumer electronic and trading in consumer electronic and home appliances. It outsourced manufacture of these articles from various concerns referred to as OEMs. The OEMs purchased raw materials on their
Rule 4, read with rule 2(p), of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - Conditions for allowing CENVAT credit - Period from July, 2005 to September, 2005 - Assessee-company paid service tax in respect of ‘Goods transport agency’s service’ received for inward
Section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994, read with section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - Business auxiliary service - Period from October, 2003 to February, 2005 - Whether where assessee was engaged in collecting payments on behalf of its clients
Section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994 - Banking and other financial services - Period from 2002-03 to 2003-04 - Whether a company can be said to be rendering banking and other financial services only if its transactions with customers are of a financia