Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India
Section 4 -Central Excise Act 1944
CA Praveen Chopra 19 March 2008 at 14:51
“Whether the Central Excise duty is payable on the assessable value determined under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act as claimed by Respondents or with reference to M.R.P. under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act as claimed by the Revenue? – the
Closure of slaughter house during Paryushan festival of Jain
CA Jonu Jain 19 March 2008 at 14:51
SC held the resolution passed by the Standing Committee of the Municipal Corporation of Ahemdabad in relation to closure of slaughter house during Paryushan festival of Jain is valid is law.
Input credit by outdoor caterers
CA Praveen Chopra 19 March 2008 at 11:02
Food for thought – Service Tax paid by Outdoor Caterers for running Canteen Services in a factory is an Input Service for availing Credit : Tribunal
Penalty-Concealment of income
CA Praveen Chopra 16 March 2008 at 21:04
The penalty U/s 271(1)(c)of the Income Tax Act 1961 could not be imposed on the assessee since it was under a bona fide belief that income on sale of debentures was taxable as capital gains. Further such gains had been treated ascapital gains in earl
Appealable order-challenge to intimation U/s 143(1)
CA Praveen Chopra 14 March 2008 at 23:22
New Sorathia Engg. Co. vs CIT 2006 GUJRAT (HC)
MANISH MISHRA 14 March 2008 at 19:17
Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Penalty - For concealment of income - Assessment year 1981-82 - Whether where penalty order and order of Commissioner (Appeals) showed that no clear-cut finding had been reached as to whether penalty un
AAR on Bonus Shares - Long term
Jagat Mehta 14 March 2008 at 16:13
Sale of originally held and bonus shares - Long-term capital gains arising to non-resident company - benefit of 10% rate u/s 112 cannot be denied : Advance Ruling Authority
SALES TAX LIABLITY ON AMORTISATION COST
CA. BIJENDER KR. BANSAL 14 March 2008 at 16:13
Interest on borrowed capital
kavita jain 13 March 2008 at 23:12
In August/September 1999, the assessee-firm granted interest free advances to its sister concerns which were disallowed by the department on the ground that the said advances were not given from the assessee’s own fund, but from the interest bearing
Perquisites- Rule 3(5), Income-tax Rules,1962- Applicability
kavita jain 13 March 2008 at 23:12
The assessee, a public school, had been charging concessional fees from the children of the employees studying in the school at the rate of 50 per cent in respect of the standard/normal tuition fees, ancillary fees and computer fees and at the rate o
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
