Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-1, Jaipur dated 01/11/2019 for the A.Y. 2010-11. Following grounds have been taken by the assessee:

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 144C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act').

This appeal by the Revenue against the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) dt.29.12.2015 and order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 144C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') for the Assessment Year 2011-12.

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Commisisoner of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, Bengaluru dt.29.02.2016 for the Assessment Year 2004-05.

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-7, Bangalore dt.05.01.2018 for the Assessment Year 2010-11.

These cross appeals are directed against separate orders of the CIT(A), both dated 26.09.2017. The relevant assessment years are 2010-2011 and 2011-2012. We shall first adjudicate the assessee’s appeal.

The Hon’ble Appellate Authority, GST,Andhra Pradesh, in the case ofOmsai Professional Detective & Security Services Pvt. Ltd. [Order No. 5132 of 2020 (dated, March 16, 2020)]held that best judgment assessment under Section 62(1) of Central Goods and

The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in M/S. V.V.V. And Sons Edible Oil Ltd. v. The State of Tamil Nadu &Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 3964 of 2020 dated December 04, 2020] disposed of the appeal filed against the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Madras High Co

The Hon'ble Kerala High Court in the case of Quality Enterprises v. Assistant State Tax Officer [W.P. (C) No. 18212 of 2020 dated September 18, 2020] has held that bank guarantee shall not be encashed till such time where assessee preferred appeal ag

The revenue has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 30-03-2018 passed by Ld CIT(A)-2, Bengaluru and it relates to the assessment year 2007-08. The only issue urged by the revenue is whether the Ld CIT(A) was justified in deleting the additi