Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The captioned appeal filed by the assessee, pertaining to assessment year 2014-15, is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)—1, Guwahati, in appeal no. 374494271250118/343, dated 07.02.2019,which in turn arises o

The present appeal has been fi led by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A), Muzaffarnagar, dated 25.01.2017.

This set of cross appeals, consisting of an appeal filed by the assessee as also another appeal filed by the Assessing Officer, call into question correctness of the order dated 25th April 2019, in the matter of assessment under section 143(3) of the

This is an appeal filed by Manjula Finance Ltd (the assessee/appellant) against the order of the Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) – 15, New Delhi ( ld CIT(A)) dated 29.12.2017 for the Assessment Year 2014-15wherein he dismissed appeal filed by th

Heard Mr. Sriram Sridharan, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. V. A. Sonpal, learned special counsel with Mr. S. B. Gore, learned AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 2; and Mr. Mohamedali Chunawala, learned counsel for respondent No.3.

The above two appeals by the assessee are preferred against the common order of the CIT(A) – 4, Kanpur dated 30.11.2018 pertaining to A.Ys 2013-14 and 2014-15. The underlying facts in issues are identical. Therefore, both these appeals are disposed o

Having regard to the Customs Tariff Act 1975 as amended from time to time (hereinafter referred as the Act) and the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Antidumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rule

Heard Sri Sandeep Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Avinash Chandra Tripathi, learned counsel for the State-respondents.

This appeal by the assessee emanates from the order passed by the CIT(A)-3, Pune on 01-07-2016 in relation to the assessment year 2005-06.

Heard Sri A.P. Mathur, counsel for the petitioner, Sri B.K.S. Raghuvansi, counsel for the respondents and perused the record.