Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

ITA No.1463/Del/2015 and 415/Del/2016 are two separate appeals by the assessee preferred against two separate orders framed u/s. 143 (3) r.w.s. 144 C of the Act dated 26.02.2014 and 19.11.2015 pertaining to A.Y.2010-11 and 2011-12 respectively.

This appeal is preferred by the assessee against order dated 19.01.2017 passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-8, New Delhi {CIT(A)} for Assessment Year 2012-13.

The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in M/S Metenere Ltd. v. Union of India and another[Writ Tax No. 360 of 2020 dated December 17, 2020] quashed the order of confiscation of 12,979 metric tonnes of stock, passed by the Additional Commissioner, GST & Cen

These two appeals are filed by the assessee are directed against separate, but identical orders of learned CIT(A) -19, Chennai both dated 07.12.2017 and pertain to assessment years 2007-08and 2013-14. Since, the facts are identical and issues are com

This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against theorder of the learned CIT(Appeals)-4, Chennai dated 28.12.2018 and pertains to assessment year 2015-16.

These two appeals filed by the Revenue are directed against common order of the learned CIT(Appeals)-5, Chennai dated31.10.2019 and pertain to assessment years 2012-13 and 2013-14.Since, the facts are identical and issues are common, for the sake of

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the learned CIT(Appeals)-8, Chennai dated 06.02.2019 and pertains to assessment year 2015-16.

The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 26.09.2016 passed by Ld CIT(A)-7, Bengaluru and it relates to the assessment year 2011-12.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Paramvir Singh Saini v. Baljit Singh & Others [Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 3543 of 2020 dated December 2, 2020] directed installation of CCTV- Camera at investigation agencies offices and police stat

The Hon'ble AAAR, Karnataka, in the matter of M/S. Ncs Pearson Inc.,[Order No. KAR/AAAR/07/2020-21 (dated, November 13, 2020)] held that,the scoring done by the human scorer is to be regarded as being within the realm of minimum human intervention.Se