Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

Aforesaid appeal by revenue for Assessment Year 2014-15 contest the order of learned first appellate authority on certain grounds of appeal. Upon perusal of Form-36, it is noted that thename of the assessee has erroneously been written as Shri Hirala

This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)(in short ‘Ld. CIT(A)-II, Indore dated 21.08.2019 pertaining to assessment year 2010-11. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:

This is Revenue’s appeal for the A.Y. 2013-14 against the order of Ld.CIT(A), Hyderabad dated 25.04.2019.

This is assessee’s appeal for the A.Y 2016-17 against the order of the CIT (A)-5, Hyderabad, dated 18.09.2019.

This is assessee’s appeal for the A.Y 2011-12 against the order of the CIT (A)-7, Hyderabad, dated 7.10.2019.

These two appeals by the assessee are directed against acommon order dated 30/03/2017 passed by the learned CIT(Appeals)-31, New Delhi [in short ‘the Ld. CIT(A)’] for assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12 respectively. As common  issue in dispute are

This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order ofthe CIT(A)-38, New Delhi dated 23.10.2017 pertaining to A.Y. 2013-14.

The Hon'ble Gujarat AAR, in the matter of M/s Amneal Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. [Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/R/50/2020, dated July 30, 2020] held that GST would be levied on recovery of amount from employee on account of third party canteen services p

The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in All Gujarat Federation of Tax Consultants v. Union of India [R/Special Civil Application No. 13653 and 660 of 2021, dated January 13, 2021] dismissed the writ applications filed for extension of the due date of filin

The Hon'ble Gujarat AAR, in the matter of M/s Amneal Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. [Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/R/51/2020, dated July 30, 2020] recently held that GST at the rate of 18% is applicable on recovery of notice pay from the employees who leave