Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

Aforesaid appeal by revenue for Assessment Year 2014-15 contest the order of learned first appellate authority on certain grounds of appeal. Upon perusal of Form-36, it is noted that thename of the assessee has erroneously been written as Shri Hirala

This is Revenue’s appeal for the A.Y. 2013-14 against the order of Ld.CIT(A), Hyderabad dated 25.04.2019.

This is assessee’s appeal for the A.Y 2016-17 against the order of the CIT (A)-5, Hyderabad, dated 18.09.2019.

These two appeals by the assessee are directed against acommon order dated 30/03/2017 passed by the learned CIT(Appeals)-31, New Delhi [in short ‘the Ld. CIT(A)’] for assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12 respectively. As common  issue in dispute are

This is assessee’s appeal for the A.Y 2011-12 against the order of the CIT (A)-7, Hyderabad, dated 7.10.2019.

This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order ofthe CIT(A)-38, New Delhi dated 23.10.2017 pertaining to A.Y. 2013-14.

The Hon'ble Gujarat AAR, in the matter of M/s Amneal Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. [Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/R/50/2020, dated July 30, 2020] held that GST would be levied on recovery of amount from employee on account of third party canteen services p

The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in All Gujarat Federation of Tax Consultants v. Union of India [R/Special Civil Application No. 13653 and 660 of 2021, dated January 13, 2021] dismissed the writ applications filed for extension of the due date of filin

The Hon'ble Gujarat AAR, in the matter of M/s Amneal Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. [Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/R/51/2020, dated July 30, 2020] recently held that GST at the rate of 18% is applicable on recovery of notice pay from the employees who leave

This appeal by assessee has been directed against the order of Ld. CIT(Appeals), Muzaffarnagar dated 14.11.2017 for AY 2012-13, challenging the reopening of the assessment u/s148 of the IT Act and addition of Rs. 18,78,400/- u/s 69A ofthe IT Act.