The Hon'ble AAAR, Karnataka, in the matter of M/S. Ncs Pearson Inc.,[Order No. KAR/AAAR/07/2020-21 (dated, November 13, 2020)] held that,the scoring done by the human scorer is to be regarded as being within the realm of minimum human intervention.Se
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the assessment order dated 28.08.2017 passed by the AO for the assessment year2013-14 u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144C of the Act in pursuance of directions given by Ld Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP).
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 28.09.2017 passed by Ld CIT(A)-3, Bengaluru and it relates to the assessment year 2013-14.
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 23.10.2017 passed by Ld CIT(A)-3, Bengaluru for the assessment year 2011-12.
These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against orders of CIT(A), both dated 22.11.2017. The relevant assessment years are 2013-2014 and 2014-2015.
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated28.02.2018 passed by Ld CIT(A)-5, Bengaluru and it relates to theassessment year 2014-15.
This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against CIT(A)’s order dated 27.12.2017. The relevant assessment year is 2003-2004.
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 07.03.2018 passed by Ld CIT(A), Hubbali for the assessment year 2013-14.
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated15.03.2018 passed by Ld CIT(A)-3, Bengaluru and it relates to the assessment year 2013-14.
This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against CIT(A)’s order dated 27.06.2019. The relevant assessment year is 2014-2015.