Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India
Penalty ought to be waived off in the appeal under Vivaad se Vishwas Scheme.
Guest 09 February 2021 at 12:38
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-13, New Delhi, dated 17.08.2018 under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for the Assessment Year 2013-14.
Amba Properties Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi ACIT Circle-2(2), New Delhi
Guest 09 February 2021 at 12:38
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT (Appeals)-1, New Delhi dated 28.06.2019 for the Assessment Year 2016-17.
The order of CIT(Appeals) is unsustainable when the appeal of the assessee is not admitted
Guest 09 February 2021 at 12:38
This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT (Appeals)–I, New Delhi, dated 31.12.2018 for Assessment Year 2010-11, wherein the appeal of the assessee was not admitted by the CIT (Appeals) for want of jurisdiction. There
Rajeev Suri Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
Guest 09 February 2021 at 12:38
By these petition(s)/appeal(s)/case(s), we are called upon by the petitioners to undertake a comprehensive and heightened judicial scrutiny regarding the permissibility of the Central Vista Project1 of the Government of India. Diverse issues concerni
Assessee should not suffer on account of non-appearance of the Counsel, says ITAT
Guest 09 February 2021 at 12:38
This appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-36, New Delhi, Dated 26.07.2019, for the A.Y. 2007-2008.
The Hon'ble AAAR Karnataka, in the matter of M/s. Midcon Polymers Pvt. Ltd. [Order No. KAR/AAAR/01/2020-21, dated January 11, 2021] held thatthe property tax paid to the Municipal Authority cannot be deducted from the monthly rental income for arrivi
Penal provisions of the CGST Act prevails over Cr.PC for GST frauds
Bimal Jain 04 February 2021 at 15:11
The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in Tejas Pravin Dugad v. Union of India [Order No. Criminal Writ Petition No.1715 to 1718 of 2020, decided on January 15, 2021] dismissed the writ petition filed by Directors of M/s. Ganraj Ispat Private Limited ("Compan
The Hon'ble AAR, Haryana, in the matter of M/S. Wilhelm Fricke SE [Advance Ruling No. HAR/HAAR/R/2019-20/24, decided onJune 25, 2020] held that, the Germany based head office and Indian Liaison Office ("LO") cannot be treated as separate persons as n
Bombay HC: Stayed the Service Tax demand notice issued to CA based on ITR
Bimal Jain 30 January 2021 at 18:09
The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in Amrish Rameshchandra Shah v. the Union of India &ors. [Writ Petition (L) No. 2103 o 2021, dated January 27, 2021] stayed the show cause-cum-demand notice issued to a Chartered Accountant in a Writ Petition challenging
The Hon'ble A AAR, Maharashtra in M/s. Sanofi India Ltd. (Order No. MAH/AAAR/SS-RJ/10/2019-20 dated October 22, 2019) has held that as per Section 101(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("CGST Act") no advance ruling can be issued w.r
CAclubindia
