Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in TMA International Pvt. Ltd. &Ors. v. Union of India &Anr. [W.P.(C) 2694/2019 & CM No. 26556/2020, dated March 26, 2021] directed to Revenue Authorities to grant refund claim of Integrated Goods and Services Tax ('IGST'

The AAR, Haryana in the matter of M/S. Jewel Classic Hotels Pvt. Ltd. [Advance Ruling No. HAR/HAAR/R/2019-20/23, decided on June 25, 2020] held that the facilities for food catering, banquet etc. provided in self-owned marriage and party halls by sep

The Hon'ble AAR Haryana in M/s. KSC Buildcon Private Limited [Advance Ruling No. HAR/HAAR/R/2019-20/26 decided on August 28, 2020] observed that major part of the contract involves earthwork (more than 75%) provided to a Government Entity. Hence, the

The Hon'ble Sikkim High Court in M/s.Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd. v. UOI &Ors. [I.A. No.03 of 2020 in WP(C) No.47 of 2018 (dated November 2, 2020)] rejected the application filed under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Proce

The petitioner is a dealer in two wheelers. He was an assesseeregistered under Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The petitioner washaving input tax credit to the tune of Rs.4,85,684/-. Following the introductionof GST regime, transition and migra

Steel products were supplied by the respondent to one M/s.Diamond Engineering Pvt. Ltd. [“the company”] from 21.09.2015 to11.11.2016, as a result of which INR 24,20,91,054/- was due and payableby the company. As many as 51 cheques were issued by the

By its judgment dated 24 October 2019, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal2 held that a person who is ineligible under Section 29A of the Insolvency Bankruptcy Code, 20163 to submit a resolution plan, is also barred from proposing a scheme of

The Hon'ble AAR Rajasthan in M/s. Jeet & Jeet Glass and Chemicals Private Limited[Advance Ruling No.RAJ/AAR/2020-21/08 decided on August 24, 2020] held that the activity of job work consisting of bullet proof body building on the motor vehicles provi

The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in M/s. Anandeshwar Traders v. State of UP [Writ Tax No. 503 of 2020 decided on January 18, 2021] held that the order demanding tax and penalty passed by Revenue under Section 129(3) of the Central Goods and Services

The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in Sanjiv Madhusudan Shah v. Assistant Commissioner of Central and Service Tax and ors. [Writ Petition (L) No. 646 of 2021 dated January 12, 2021] has stayed a demand notice issued, seeking to levy service tax upon an Ad