Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-2, Aurangabad on 13-04-2017 deleting penalty of Rs.2,26,23,440 imposed by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A), Pune-5, Pune on 29-08-2017 in relation to the assessment year 2008-09.

This appeal by the Revenue arises out of the order passed by the CIT(A)-4, Pune on 20-10-2017 in relation to the assessment year 2014-15.

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the final order passed by the DCIT, Circle 1(2), Pune on 16-10-2017 in relation to the assessment year 2013-14.

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the ex parte order passed by the CIT(A)-1, Aurangabad on 31-10-2017 in relation to the assessment year 2012-13.

This appeal by the Revenue arises out of the order passed by the CIT(A)-4, Pune on 04-07-2017 in relation to the assessment year 2011-12.

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-4, Pune on 08-04-2019 in relation to the assessment year 2009-10.

This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-2, Kolhapur on 12-12-2017 in relation to the assessment year 2014-15.

These two appeals are filed by the assessee and the Revenue against the order dated 17/11/2016 passed by the CIT(A)- 44, New Delhi for Assessment Year 2010-11.

The AAR, Karnataka in the matter of M/s. Bow-ring Institute [Order No. KAR ADRG 27/2021, dated April 22, 2021] held that, the members-club is not liable to pay Goods and Services Tax ("GST") on subscription fees and infrastructure development fund co