Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in M/S. Rajkamal Builder Infrastructure Private Limited v. Union of India [R/Special Civil Application No. 21534 of 2019, dated March 23, 2021] quashed and set aside the order issued by the Revenue Department in Form GS

The petitioner�Cochin Port Trust is aggrieved by the refusal of the 1st respondent to encash Bank Guarantee and transfer the same to the petitioner. The petitioner also seeks to declare that invocation of the Bank Guarantee during the claim period is

The petitioner, who is running a proprietary business in construction, hardware and paint materials, has filed this writ petition seeking to command respondents 1 to 3 to immediately release loan papers, security title deeds and other documents obtai

The petitioner, who is a Chartered Accountant registered with the 1st respondent-Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, is aggrieved by the refusal of the 1st respondent to register his sole proprietorship on its website. The petitioner sought

The Hon'ble AAAR, Karnataka in Re: M/s Page Industries Limited [Order No. KAR/AAAR/05/2021, dated April 16, 2021] held that the promotional products/materials & marketing items which are distributed to their distributors/franchisee free of cost ('FOC

This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 18.08.2017 pa*ssed by the ld. CIT(Appeals)-13, Pune in relation to the assessment year 2010-11, deleting penalty of Rs.74,87,580/- imposed by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s.271(1)(c) of t

This appeal preferred by the Revenue emanates from the order of the Ld. CIT(Appeals)-2, Aurangabad dated 11.09.2017 for the assessment year 2011-12 as per the ground of appeal on record.

This appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of the Ld. CIT(Appeals)-2, Kolhapur dated 01.11.2017 for the assessment year 2012-13 as per the grounds of appeal on record.

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 29.09.2017 passed by the ld. CIT(Appeal), Pune-1 in relation to the assessment year 2014-15.

At the outset itself, Ms Kinjal Shah, Learned Counsel for the assessee, submitted before the Bench that assessee has opted the benefit of the “Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020”. Two copies of Form No.3 under ‘the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act,