Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The assessee vide its application seeks permission to withdraw the impugned appeal for the reason that, it has opted for the scheme under “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”.

Allowed, subject to just exceptions and as per extant Rules.

This is an appeal preferred by the Assessee against the order of Ld.CIT(A)-6, Kolkata, dated 22.10.2018 for A.Y. 2015-16.

Present writ petition has been filed challenging the OM dated 17 W.P. (C) 1569/2021 th February, 2020 to the extent that it declares that only those candidates whose results for recruitment were declared before 01st January, 2004 against vacancies o

The Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat in Alkem Laboratories Ltd. v. Union of India [R/Special Civil Application No. 994 of 2021, decided on February 4, 2021] quashed and set aside the order imposing liability of Service tax along with interest & penalty

The Hon’ble CESTAT Bangalore, in M/S. Anheuser Busch Inbev India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Tax [Service Tax Appeal No. 20374 of 2020, decided on February 18, 2021] held that no service tax under reverse charge mechanism is payable on the licens

This appeal at the instance of Revenue and Cross Objection preferred by the assessee are directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-V, Bangalore Dt.1.3.2013. The relevant Assessment Year is 2005-06.

Both the appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the common order dated 12.06.2019 passed by Ld CIT(A), Mangaluru and they relate to the assessment year 2015-16 and 2016-17. Sincecertain common issues are urged in these two appeals, both t

This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the order of CIT(A) dated 28.12.2017. The relevant assessment year is 2012-2013.

All these appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the common order dated 30.3.2017 passed by Ld. CIT(A)-7, Bengaluru and they relate to the assessment years 2006-07 to 2012-13. Allthese appeals were heard together and hence they are being