Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 27.02.2018 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2,Noida relating to Assessment Year 2009-10.

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 22.06.2018 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-33, New Delhi relating to Assessment Year 2009-10.

These two appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the two different orders of Ld. CIT(A)-18, New Delhi dated 06.04.2017 and Ld.CIT(A)-35, New Delhi dated 05.03.2019 for the same assessment year 2011-12. 

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 22.07.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-17, New Delhi relating to Assessment Year 2011-12

The Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in Raj Metal Industries & Anr. v. UOI & Ors. [W. P. A. 1629 of 2021, dated March 24, 2021] stayed the summons issued and proceedings initiated thereunder against assessee by the State GST Authorities since the proceedi

These two cross appeals - one by the assessee and the other by the Revenue arise out of the order dated 24-08-2016 passed by the CIT(A)-13, Pune in relation to the assessment year 2011-12. 

This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 6, Pune (‘CIT(A)’ for short)b dated 20.12.2017 for the assessment year 2011-12 in confirming levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the

This is an appeal filed by the assessee society directed against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax, Exemption, Pune (‘CIT, Exemption’ for short) dated 29.09.2020 denying the grant of registration u/s12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961

 These are appeals by the Revenue against respective orders of learned CIT(A). Some issues are common and connected these are being consolidated and disposed of by this common order.

During hearing of these appeals, none appeared for assessee. The perusal of order sheet entries show that none has appeared for assessee on several occasions. The Ld. DR pointed out that the assessee did not appear even before learned first appellate