All these appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the common order dated 30.3.2017 passed by Ld. CIT(A)-7, Bengaluru and they relate to the assessment years 2006-07 to 2012-13. Allthese appeals were heard together and hence they are being
This is an appeal of the assessee against the order dated 26.07.2019 passed by CIT(A), Mysore, relating to Assessment Year 2010-11. The first issue that arises for consideration in this appeal is as to whether the Revenue authorities were justified i
The Supreme Court on 2nd March 2021 held that Indian Companies need not deduct tax for the amount they pay foreign manufacturers and suppliers for use or re-sale of computer software through end-user license agreements (EULA).
These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against two different orders of CIT(A) dated 30.12.2011 and28.12.2011 respectively. The relevant assessment years are 2006-2007 and 2009-2010.
This is an appeal of the assessee against the order dated 27.08.2019 of CIT(A)-6, Bengaluru, relating to Assessment Year 2010-11.
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order dated29.11.2019 of CIT(A)-10, Bengaluru, relating to Assessment Year 2009-09.
This is an appeal of the assessee against the order dated 28.08.2020 ofCIT(A), Davangere, relating to Assessment Year 2008-09.
The present appeal filed by the revenue is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-50, Mumbai, which in turn arises from the assessment order passed by the A.O under Sec. 153A r.w.s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, dated 27.03.2015 for ass
This is an appeal filed by the Revenue. The relevant assessment year is2009-10. The appeal is directed against the order of the Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Appeals)-50, Mumbai [in short ‘CIT(A)’] and arises out ofassessment completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s.
LIVE Course on Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA)(with recording)
LIVE Course on Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA)(without recording)
CAclubindia
