Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking to quash the impugned demand dated 08.11.2016 raised by the respondent for conversion of the property from leasehold to freehold. A direction is also sought to the respondent to execute the Convey

By an order of assessment dated 31.01.2005, the Assessing Officer restricted the eligible deduction under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter “the Act”) to the extent of ‘business income’ only. On 23.03.2006, the Commissioner of In

Information sought by the Respondents in Transferred Case (Civil) No.91 of 2015 was not given by the Reserve Bank of India (for short, ‘RBI’) on the ground that such information is exempted from disclosure under Section 8 (1) (a), (d) and (e) of the

The respondent is in the business of manufacture and export of computer software. It filed returns of income for the Assessment Year 2008-09 on 30.09.2008, declaring an income of Rs.98,03,41,570/- which was processed on 8.06.2011, determining the tot

None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, vide an application dated 23.04.2021which is placed on file, the assessee has submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (hereinafter, the ‘scheme’) and had fil

None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, vide an application dated 23.04.2021which is placed on file, the assessee has submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (hereinafter, the ‘scheme’) and had fil

None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, an application dated 20.04.2021 on behalf of the assessee has been placed on record wherein the assessee has submitted that the assessee wants to withdraw this appeal since assessee had filed Form 1 a

None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, vide an application dated Nil, which is placed on file, the assessee has submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (hereinafter, the ‘scheme’) and had filed Fo

None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, vide an application dated Nil, which is placed on file, the assessee has submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (hereinafter, the ‘scheme’) and had filed Fo

This assessee’s appeal for AY.2012-13 arises from the CIT(A)-6, Hyderabad’s order dated 12-11-2018 passed in case No.10018/2018-19/A3/CIT(A)-6, in proceedings u/s.154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, ‘the Act’]. Heard both the parties. Case fil