Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

All these appeals, assail the judgment and orderof the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi(hereinafter referred to as “NCLAT”) dated 5.8.2020, passed in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) Nos. 344­345 of 2020.

The present Appeals raise two important issues for our consideration : (i) the period of limitation for filing an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the 1996 Act”); and (ii) whether theCourt may refuse to mak

This batch of statutory appeals (being Civil AppealNos. 1827/2018, 1875/2018, 1832/2018 and 3213/2018) under Section 130E of the Customs Act, 1962 arises from acommon final order of the Central Excise and Service TaxAppellate Tribunal (‘CESTAT’) date

By its judgment dated 29 August 2019, the National Company Law Tribunal stayed the termination by the appellant of its Power Purchase Agreement with Astonfield Solar (Gujarat) Private Limited . The order of the NCLT was passed in applications4 moved

Heard Mr. Prasannan Namboodiri, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Pradeep Jetly, learned senior counsel for the respondents.

Heard Mr. Prasannan Namboodiri, learned counsel for thepetitioners and Mr. Pradeep Jetly, learned senior counsel for the respondents.

Heard Mr. Vikram Nankani, learned senior advocate for the petitioner; Mr. Rajiv Chavan, learned senior advocate for Respondent Nos.1(a), 1(c), 2, 3 and 4; and Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly, learned senior advocate for Respondent Nos.1(b), 5 and 6.

Heard Mr.Ashwin Gopakumar, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr.Anil C. Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General for respondent Nos.1,2,3 and 6 to 11; and Mr.Prathamesh Kamat, learned counsel for respondent No.4.

Learned counsel for the assessee submits that the assessee has approached under the 'Vivad se Vishwas' scheme and Form 3 under the scheme has been issued. He, therefore, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal and has filed a memo in this re

This is an appeal filed by the Revenue. The relevant assessment year is 2009-10. The appeal is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-32, Mumbai [in short ‘CIT(A)’] and arises out of the assessment completed u/s 143(3)