Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The above four appeals are cross-appeals by the Revenue and the assessee directed against orders of the ld.CIT(A)-7, Ahmedabad of even dated i.e. 12.02.2018 for the above two assessment years. All these four appeals are disposed of by this common ord

Assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against order of the ld.CIT(A)-6, Ahmedabad passed for the Asstt.Year 2010-11.

The present appeal is directed at the instance of the assessee against confirmation of levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the ld.CIT(A) vide order dated 4.9.2018 for the Asstt.year 2009-10.

Aggrieved the order dated 01.01.2019 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-14, Delhi ("Ld. CIT(A)") confirming the order dated 30.01.2017 passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act") by the ITO, Ward 41(5)

These two appeals by the assessee and Revenue against the common order dated 27-02-2015 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-13, Pune [„CIT(A)‟] for assessment year 2005-06.

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the final assessment order dated 19.9.2018 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s.143(3) read with section 144C(13) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called „the Act‟) in relation to the a

These two appeals by the assessee for the for assessment years 2012-13 and 2013-14 are directed against the orders of Dispute Resolution Panel-3, Mumbai.

This appeal by the Revenue against the order dated 06-03-2020 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-6, Pune [„CIT(A)‟] for assessment year 2015-16.

The Court considered it appropriate to direct that such services may be effected by e-mail, FAX, commonly used instant messaging services, such as WhatsApp, Telegram, and Signal etc. However, if such services are made by means of said instant messagi

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court ("HC") in Vandna Pharma Industries v. Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax ("GST") [W.P. (C) No. 5228/2021 decided on May 07, 2021] noted that nothing has been shown to the Court by the Revenue Department which would con