Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

This assessee’s appeal for AY.2011-12 arises from the CIT(A)-6, Hyderabad’s order dated 07-06-2019 passed in appeal No.10620/2018-19/A3/CIT(A)-6, in proceedings u/s.143(3) r.w.s.147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, ‘the Act’].

Heard Mr.N.V.Balaji, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents.

These 16 writ petitions have been filed by Co-operative Societies, being either Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Societies, Thrift Societies,employees Societies or other categories of Co-operative Societies, and challenge intimations under Se

This Writ Petition has been filed for a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to refund the tax amount of Rs.1,10,999/- with minimum interest borne by the petitioner under mistake of law. The petitioner was a recipient of service from M/s.IMC Lim

The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in M/S. Rajkamal Builder Infrastructure Private Limited v. Union of India [R/Special Civil Application No. 21534 of 2019, dated March 23, 2021] quashed and set aside the order issued by the Revenue Department in Form GS

The petitioner�Cochin Port Trust is aggrieved by the refusal of the 1st respondent to encash Bank Guarantee and transfer the same to the petitioner. The petitioner also seeks to declare that invocation of the Bank Guarantee during the claim period is

The petitioner, who is running a proprietary business in construction, hardware and paint materials, has filed this writ petition seeking to command respondents 1 to 3 to immediately release loan papers, security title deeds and other documents obtai

The petitioner, who is a Chartered Accountant registered with the 1st respondent-Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, is aggrieved by the refusal of the 1st respondent to register his sole proprietorship on its website. The petitioner sought

The Hon'ble AAAR, Karnataka in Re: M/s Page Industries Limited [Order No. KAR/AAAR/05/2021, dated April 16, 2021] held that the promotional products/materials & marketing items which are distributed to their distributors/franchisee free of cost ('FOC

This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 18.08.2017 pa*ssed by the ld. CIT(Appeals)-13, Pune in relation to the assessment year 2010-11, deleting penalty of Rs.74,87,580/- imposed by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s.271(1)(c) of t